JP Fitness Forums powered by fitness insite  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums > Fitness > Training Discussion > Youth Athletic Development
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Youth Athletic Development This is the place to go if you are an athlete, coach or parent who wants to unlock the secrets of how to develop a super-athlete.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2004, 10:03 AM   #1 (permalink)
Bill Hartman Certified
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,177
Post

Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: a randomized controlled trial.

Fuchs RK, Bauer JJ, Snow CM.

Bone Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331-3303, USA.

Physical activity during childhood is advocated as one strategy for enhancing peak bone mass (bone mineral content [BMC]) as a means to reduce osteoporosis-related fractures. Thus, we investigated the effects of high-intensity jumping on hip and lumbar spine bone mass in children. Eighty-nine prepubescent children between the ages of 5.9 and 9.8 years were randomized into a jumping (n = 25 boys and n = 20 girls) or control group (n = 26 boys and n = 18 girls). Both groups participated in the 7-month exercise intervention during the school day three times per week. The jumping group performed 100, two-footed jumps off 61-cm boxes each session, while the control group performed nonimpact stretching exercises. BMC (g), bone area (BA; cm2), and bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2) of the left proximal femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Hologic QDR/4500-A). Peak ground reaction forces were calculated across 100, two-footed jumps from a 61-cm box. In addition, anthropometric characteristics (height, weight, and body fat), physical activity, and dietary calcium intake were assessed. At baseline there were no differences between groups for anthropometric characteristics, dietary calcium intake, or bone variables. After 7 months, jumpers and controls had similar increases in height, weight, and body fat. Using repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA; covariates, initial age and bone values, and changes in height and weight) for BMC, the primary outcome variable, jumpers had significantly greater 7-month changes at the femoral neck and lumbar spine than controls (4.5% and 3.1%, respectively). In repeated measures ANCOVA of secondary outcomes (BMD and BA), BMD at the lumbar spine was significantly greater in jumpers than in controls (2.0%) and approached statistical significance at the femoral neck (1.4%; p = 0.085). For BA, jumpers had significantly greater increases at the femoral neck area than controls (2.9%) but were not different at the spine. Our data indicate that jumping at ground reaction forces of eight times body weight is a safe, effective, and simple method of improving bone mass at the hip and spine in children. This program could be easily incorporated into physical education classes.

Bill Hartman, President, Brian Grasso Fan Club
Bill Hartman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2004, 01:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
I see banned people
 
hard_rox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Northeast
Posts: 3,357
Post

Quote:
Our data indicate that jumping at ground reaction forces of eight times body weight is a safe, effective, and simple method of improving bone mass
bill, excuse my ignorance, but what exactly does this mean?
hard_rox is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2004, 04:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
Bill Hartman Certified
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,177
Post

Ground reaction force is the force produced by the ground upward against your feet when standing. Otherwise you'd fall through!

So in this study they had kids jump downward from a 61 cm box. The force at ground contact was 8 times their body weight. 90 pound kid = 720 pounds of force. The cool thing about the study is that is shows the force absorption capabilities of the study group and that this form of training under appropriate supervision is beneficial. While there is no form of training that is 100% safe, the fear of serious injury (the ol' growth plate concerns) is most likely exaggerated. Increased bone mineral content is especially an issue for girls as the density of their bones gained at a younger age carries over quite well to adulthood.

Bill
Bill Hartman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 AM.

Features ...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger