The second sentence in that article made me laugh:
Editing seems to be a lost art form. Websites are often terrible, however, I've seen some pretty glaring errors on the front page of the Toronto Star as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedWifey
FAST update:
Today I'm 37 and 6 (weeks and days). I've now officially switched to weekly appointments. And I have strep B for the first time during pregnancy. Not a terribly big deal, but they like for positive mothers to have two doses of IV antibiotics during labor...separated by 4 hours. Hmmm, that could be a problem.
Is the problem that you aren't usually in labour for that long? Anyway, I hope things turn out well for both you and baby Luke.
Yeah, that's the problem, Anne. From first contraction at home to final push, Jack's delivery was four hours long. And with as many preliminary contractions as I'm currently having...it could be shorter!! Akk!
Hope all goes well, although I agree - many of us would envy a 4 hour labor! My 2nd was "only" 8 hours, but my DD took 23 1/2 hours... I did not enjoy that.
Well, we successfully made it through getting to the first day of school so NOW he can come any time. I know, I keep saying that. I've been having contractions for DAYS and he seems to have dropped some, so we'll see how this thing plays out. The most awesome solution would be for him to come in the evening or late night, that way I wouldn't have to worry about getting the kids in the right spot or Michael getting to me quickly enough. We'll see...
Been lurking here some; and I wanted to ask what number baby is this for you? Sorry if that's been answered earlier; I think I missed some posts back there!