JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training > Fitness > Training Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Training Discussion Ask workout questions or share your knowledge.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-07-2005, 11:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
raymond3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: orlando,fl
Posts: 876
Post

I usually do 30/60's or sometimes 20/40's...but recently I read in a couple different places about doing 2 min at 80%, then 2 min at 45-50%...then repeat 3-4 times.

Is this necessarily better because the actual "sprint" is longer, or would it be better to go at say 90% for the 30 sec? Im thinking of alternating them, but want to see whats best for fat loss, anyone?
raymond3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 12:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Buk
Jumpman Jr.
 
Buk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 2,957
Post

I would say no, intensity is better than duration. If you can perform the 30 or 20 seconds at a higher intensity than the 2 minutes, your results will be better with the shorter intervals. Do some research on Tabata intervals. They are intervals of 20/10 work/rest with maximum effort for the 20 second work periods, usually repeated 6 to 8 times. I like to do Tabata intervals with unconventional cardio: cleans, squat thrusts, box jumps, dumbell swings. These produce killer workouts!
__________________
Low expectations yield insignificant results
Eat Surf and Turf
Buk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-07-2005, 12:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
wingsfan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 959
Post

6/9 intervals on a bike are pretty good. 6 seconds of work, 9 seconds of rest. they're a killer after doing about 8 of them and then resting for a minute or so before going at it again.
wingsfan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 12:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Buk
Jumpman Jr.
 
Buk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 2,957
Post

This was the original study that "Created" Tabata intervals. Many more studies have been done since. I think the reason that they don't have much of a reputation is because of the difficulity. The effort required for these wouldn't fly on an infomercial.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...392&query_hl=8
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Oct;28(10):1327-30. Related Articles, Links

Effects of moderate-intensity endurance and high-intensity intermittent training on anaerobic capacity and VO2max.

Tabata I, Nishimura K, Kouzaki M, Hirai Y, Ogita F, Miyachi M, Yamamoto K.

Department of Physiology and Biomechanics, National Institute of Fitness and Sports, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan.

This study consists of two training experiments using a mechanically braked cycle ergometer. First, the effect of 6 wk of moderate-intensity endurance training (intensity: 70% of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), 60 min.d-1, 5 d.wk-1) on the anaerobic capacity (the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit) and VO2max was evaluated. After the training, the anaerobic capacity did not increase significantly (P > 0.10), while VO2max increased from 53 +/- 5 ml.kg-1 min-1 to 58 +/- 3 ml.kg-1.min-1 (P &lt 0.01) ( mean +/- SD ). Second, to quantify the effect of high-intensity intermittent training on energy release, seven subjects performed an intermittent training exercise 5 d.wk-1 for 6 wk. The exhaustive intermittent training consisted of seven to eight sets of 20-s exercise at an intensity of about 170% of VO2max with a 10-s rest between each bout. After the training period, VO2max increased by 7 ml.kg-1.min-1, while the anaerobic capacity increased by 28%. In conclusion, this study showed that moderate-intensity aerobic training that improves the maximal aerobic power does not change anaerobic capacity and that adequate high-intensity intermittent training may improve both anaerobic and aerobic energy supplying systems significantly, probably through imposing intensive stimuli on both systems.
__________________
Low expectations yield insignificant results
Eat Surf and Turf
Buk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 12:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
raymond3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: orlando,fl
Posts: 876
Post

Ok cool, thats kinda what I figured as well. I read it before in Owen's book (MH) and then saw it the other day on another site...I thought the shorter intervals at a higher intensity were better, but wanted to double check. Appreciate it guys.
raymond3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0

 

Web

forums.jpfitness.com

 

web stats