During the past five months, I've followed a program (Mike Mejia's Homegrown Muscle from Mens Health) that has varied exercises and set/rep schemes. Although I've read and had explained to me some of the usual "heavy weights/low reps/more strength" explanations, I'm curious about a couple of things.
The lowest rep work I've done has been on a traditional 5X5 scheme, where the weight used is my 5 or 6 rep max, and, then reps typically decrease each set after the first set or two (e.g. 5-5-4-4-3). BUT, in that scheme, I stayed with 5 reps until I could do 5 reps on all sets, before increasing weight. Why would one do that rather than increase reps on all sets all the time, until, say reps looked like 7-6-5-5-4, and then increase weight? What benefit is gained, what is the purpose? Is this a standard protocol for even lower rep work as well?
However, when doing higher rep sets, say 8 reps for 3 sets, does not one generally do their max/near max number of reps on each set, until able to do AT LEAST 8 reps on all 3 sets, resulting in, perhaps, sets of 10-9-8? (This is what I've generally done.) Why not stay with 8 reps there on all three sets, like in the 5X5 scheme?
I'm currently doing a routine where I have some 5X5 work on exercises like power cleans, where I am told to use a lighter weight, so I'm going for higher speed, and doing a full 5 reps on all 5 sets, for athletic-related purposes. Then, it has some exercises done as 4X6, which I understand are to be done like the heavier 5X5's, noted earlier.
I'm just curious about the exact why's of some of this, particularly the difference between the way reps are done across sets in the heavier work (5X5) versus the lighter work (3 X 8 or 10).
|