JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training > Fitness > Training Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Training Discussion Ask workout questions or share your knowledge.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-27-2005, 04:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Irishdazza
Senior Member
 
Irishdazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 2,489
Post

Well, it's official: I am registered to sit for my CSCS exam on August 6th in NYC. I thought that I would start my own 'CSCS blog,' to share my experiences of preparing and taking the test with all of you, especially because I know that there are many of you considering becoming certified as personal trainers or strength coaches. If any of you have any questions about the process, feel free to ask! And if anyone has taken their CSCS, PLEASE feel free to offer any advice that you'd like. Wish me luck!

Jonathan

For info on the CSCS (or even CPT) exam and certification, start here:
http://www.nsca-cc.org/index.html
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

ReadyDad
Posted 17 May 2005 06:00 PM
Good luck.

What's the address of your blog?
Posts: 181 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 17 May 2005 06:39 PM
Thanks...I'm actually just using this thread as my 'blog.' I'm not going high tech with it! lol! :^O
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Pats Fan
Posted 17 May 2005 06:46 PM
bip,

Is the CSCS pretty much the end all, be all of the industry?
Posts: 3415 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 17 May 2005 07:24 PM
Not exactly, but I'd say it's almost a 'tie' between the NSCA's CSCS cert and ACSM, although that's pretty much apples and oranges, too. When I got certified originally, I asked my co-workers and bosses at the time which was the 'best' certification to get, since there are so many to choose from. Without blinking, the answer was ACSM, so that's what I did. I had never even heard of a CSCS until after I got my HFI! Within the industry, ACSM is huge...I have literally had interviews where once I told them I was ACSM, I was basically hired, no questions asked!

However, a CSCS is something that any other credential (besides the NASM) is not: a certified strength coach, designed specifically to work with athletes. And although you can work with athletes with a 'normal' pt cert (as I do currently), you really can't work at a top level without one...it's generally an industry standard. Of course, you can also be a 'normal' pt with the CSCS too, and that is the strength of the CSCS: its versatility. Since I plan on becoming a strength coach at the professional level after I complete my DPT degree, I thought that I might as well get my CSCS credentials now, when I have the time to do so. My grad classes shoud count towards my CEU's that I need to renew, so it makes sense to do so now.

As far as knowledge and skills needed to be successful in either test, they are both pretty high and considered to be the most rigorous tests in the industry, although I *think* that the ACSM HFI is probably more difficult and involved, but that's what I'll be finding out! Bottom line: you can't go wrong with either, but ANY certification is just a beginning. It marks a standard for book knowledge, but says very little about an individual's ability to train his/her clients effectively and intelligently. I have met some outstanding trainers with 'lesser' certifications and little/no scholastic backgrounds, as well as trainers with impressive credentials and backgrounds that really aren't worth a damn in their actual abilities and skills!
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Pats Fan
Posted 17 May 2005 07:29 PM
If I were to obtain a certification, it would be more for me, than to put into practice (although long-term, who knows). In this case, it sounds like the knowledge garnered from studying for the exams may be able to be obtained without actually sitting for the exams.

What are your thoughts?
Posts: 3415 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Pats Fan
Posted 17 May 2005 07:33 PM
I'll use an example to explain further. I am responsible for new biz development (sales) for a private wealth mgt firm catering to the high net worth client. I cover roughly 1/2 the country, speaking w/ CPA, high-end attorneys, advisors, etc. soliciting biz from their clients.

In a previous life, I was a financial advisor, obtaining the Certified Financial Planner (CFP) and Certified Trust and Financial Advisor designations, which I still have. The CFP designation is something that, even if not in the industry, provides useful information that can be utilized in daily life (budgeting, estate planning, tax planning, etc.).
Posts: 3415 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 17 May 2005 09:23 PM
If I were to obtain a certification, it would be more for me, than to put into practice (although long-term, who knows). In this case, it sounds like the knowledge garnered from studying for the exams may be able to be obtained without actually sitting for the exams.

What are your thoughts?

No question about it! My own workouts improved significantly after I studied and became certified. Before that, I was an 'average' lifter, learning from magazines and my buddies, but afterwards I had a greater knowledge and understanding of what and why these things worked, and how to make them more effective. The basic materials (text books, practic exams, etc) are sold on their websites
NSCA
https://secure2.digitalims.net/nsca-...view+Materials
ACSM
http://www.lww.com/acsmcrc//products...tificationID=2

However, I personally think that the most important things to understand as a weightlifter are anatomy & physiology, and biomechanics. You could look into reading materials in those subjects, or perhaps even audit a class or two at a local college or university, if you have the time. Understanding those subjects will have an amazing effect on your own routines and workouts.

The tests aren't inexpensive either (around $200-300, before materials costs), so if you don't plan on actually working as a trainer, it's probably not worth it to pay for the exam. However, I will say this: being responsible for properly educating a client in form, technique, and effectiveness is an amazing way to learn, as well. Taking a part-time side job as a trainer a couple of hours per week, doing something that you already love to do (assuming that you would have the time and desire to do it) is a great way to learn and make a little extra money on the side, IMHO...
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Pats Fan
Posted 17 May 2005 09:27 PM
I thought about it, and do absolutely love it, but w/ 4 1/2 yr old twins, my free time is for them. Probably as they get older and don't want to hang out w/ dad anymore will be the time to do it.

Thanks for the great info.
Posts: 3415 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Pats Fan
Posted 17 May 2005 09:28 PM
I guess the other way to go is read articles from the likes of Chad Waterbury - I've been learning alot by reading t-nation articles.
Posts: 3415 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 17 May 2005 09:31 PM
Exactly...but it still might be worth it to you to pick up a book or two from the NSCA or ACSM. I don't know of an exercise science major in the country that doesn't have at least one course that uses materials from one or both of those sources!
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Pats Fan
Posted 17 May 2005 09:33 PM
I actually have a few buddies from UMass that were exer science guys - none of them are in the field anymore, but they have a good foundation of knowledge.

Yes, I need some interesting reading material for the train.
Posts: 3415 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Pats Fan
Posted 17 May 2005 09:35 PM
Any suggestions on books would be appreciated. Hopefully, the site might explain at least briefly the contents of each book.
Posts: 3415 | Registered: 01 June 2005

mythical0376
Posted 17 May 2005 09:40 PM
what books would you recommend?
Posts: 224 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 17 May 2005 09:53 PM
Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning, Second Edition textbook, NSCA

Biomechanical Basis of Human Movement, ACSM
Essentials of Exercise Physiology, ACSM
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005


Posted 17 May 2005 11:06 PM
I'm assuming that these are as outrageously priced as anyother text book?



Posted 17 May 2005 11:43 PM
$70 on amazon.com


bipennate
Posted 18 May 2005 12:51 AM
You can get them cheaper used, but yes (*sigh*), they are ridiculously priced...
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 19 May 2005 02:11 AM
MAY 18

Just checked UPS...my books should get here on Monday, which is perfect: I should be sober from my birthday weekend by then , and I can start to look things over. My strategy is this (unless I get the books and have to re-evaluate): read the book (or most of it, anyway) and take the first exam. Read through again, pinpointing my weak areas, and then take the second exam and see if I improved. I'm taking the 'exercise science' track or recomended study materials, but if I need to, I'll order some additional stuff...this was my order:

--Item #1--

Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning, Second Edition textbook
(Member Price)
Price: $63.00

--Item #2--

CSCS Exam Content Description booklet
(Member Price)
Price: $17.95

--Item #3--

CSCS Practice Exam set (two booklets & one DVD)
Price: $52.95

Sub Total: $141.90
Tax Total: $0.00
Shipping Total: $8.00

Grand Total: $141.90
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 24 May 2005 12:49 AM
May 23

I got my books! The Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning book is fantastic: muscle physiology, neuromuscular anatomy, biomechanics, adaptive physiology, bioenergetics & endocrine system, cardiovascular physiology, etc. I'm so excited!!! I'll be skimming through the book today, as well as the content description booklet, and start my study tomorrow (the season finale of 24 is on tonight: I won't be doing anything else tonight but watching that!!!). I'm really looking forward to getting into the thick of the reading...I'm sure that I've forgotten TONS of information that this book covers! In fact, looking at some of the sample test questions and question details, I KNOW that I have! :_|
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

johan Posted 24 May 2005 01:53 PM
The Essentials od Strength Training book is a few years old. Does anyone know when the next edition will be published?
Posts: 6 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 24 May 2005 05:12 PM
I have no idea, although it looks as if the first ed was printed in 94, the 2nd ed in 2000, so maybe within the next year or two? The information is generally basic, from a physiology point of view, so the information really shouldn't change that much...The only things that I could see having any appreciable effect on the material might be more recent research on lactate effects on muscular fatigue, and *possibly* hyperplasia theory, if more evidence is discovered. There could be some more endocrine response details as well, but nothing too drastic, I would think.
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 25 May 2005 05:46 AM
MAY 24

Ok...finished the first two chapters, 'Muscle Physiology' and 'Neuromuscular Anatomy and Adaptations to Conditioning.' So far so good, as it was pretty basic, refresher stuff that I luckily didn't need much refreshing on (although some of the finer details, or rather, technical terms, brought back all kinds of anatomy 213 nightmares!).

Fun fact of the day from today's reading:

Increases in strength during the first 1 to 2 months of conditioning performed by previously sedentary people are usually not accompanied by muscle fiber hypertrophy. Consequently, it has been suggested that neural factors must adapt in some way to allow increased expression of strength. These neural adaptations actually result in less muscle being used to lift a given submaximal load during the early course of training. As a result, greater loading is imposed per unit of muscle, thereby gradually evoking hypertrophy.
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 27 May 2005 05:50 AM
MAY 26

Wow...I forgot how much straight bio textbook reading can suck! I'm enjoying the information, but my mind was wandering all over the place today! Oh well, just gotta suck it up, I guess. As it is, I finished about 10 pages short of where I had hoped to be, and therefore am only half way through the 5th chapter: Bioenergetics of Exercise and Training...my respect for Desperado grows more and more with every page! Actually, it is fun seeing how much of this is coming back to me, though...Overall, still a good experience. I'm already starting to quote some of the info to my clients, so it looks like at least some of it is sticking!

In 3 days, I've read 80 pages, 4.5 chapters (out of 600 & 26). That should put me finished with the book in about 3 weeks (less if I have fewer days like this!). Sounds just about right, according to my plan.

Fun fact of the day:

"Classic experiments by A.V. Hill on isolated animal muscle have shown that the force capability of muscle declines as the velocity of contraction increases. The relationship is not linear; the decline in force capability is steepest over the lower range of movement speeds. Human movement technique can make the best of this relationship. For example, as a vertical jump is begins, the arms swing upward, thereby exerting downward force on the body at the shoulders, slowing the upward movement of the body, and forcing the hip and knee extensor muscles to contract more slowly than they otherwise would, enabling them to generate higher forces for longer times."
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 27 May 2005 01:04 PM
I'm terribly disappointed.....where's the latin?

I'll help you out....CAVE CANUM!!!
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

randob300 Posted 27 May 2005 03:11 PM
Best of luck...with your knowledge and drive I am sure you will do fine.

This is a great thread that I am sure interests all the regular posters on here....thanks for starting it.
Posts: 2603 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 27 May 2005 05:24 PM
More like 'Cave Bioenergetics!' :^O
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 27 May 2005 05:25 PM
Thanks Randob...I'm glad you guys are enjoying it! That's what it's here for!
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Pats Fan
Posted 27 May 2005 05:55 PM
hey bip,

Do you need to have hands on knowledge of bosu balls for any of these exams just bustin'
Posts: 3415 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 27 May 2005 06:24 PM
Laugh all you want...when I'm a CSCS, you'll HAVE to listen to me! :^O
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 30 May 2005 05:39 AM
MAY 27

I finally got through 'Endocrine Responses' and 'Bioenergetics!' :_|
WARNING: If you are considering taking the CSCS and don't have any bio/physiology in your background, these two chapters are going to be very tough! Very dense chapters chock full o' information...very imformative and very interesting, but a BITCH trying to get through! I might as well have been studying in a strip club for all that I could concentrate on the reading! And while the next chapter, 'Cardiovascular and Respiratory Anatomy and Physiology' is a focs that I am comfortable and familiar with, I suspect that it may also be at least as equally challenging for the uninitiated. Plan on taking a few days, and probably a couple of re-reads, to fully appreciate all of the information. I have no doubt that I will be revisiting these two a few more times before Aug 6!

I actually have TWO fun facts today (too good to decide on just one!):

In men, testosterone values are typically highest in the morning and drop with time throughout the day. This may make the increases in the morning easier, but exercise-induced increases later in the day are more effective for increasing overall testosterone concentrations over an entire day. Pg. 104

...(S)erum increases in GH (growth hormone) are differentially sensitive to the volume of exercise, the amount of rest between sets (less rest, higher GH), and resistance used (10RM produces higher lactate values and higher GH responses). When the intensity used was 10RM (heavy resistance) with three sets of each exercise (high total work, approximately 60,000 J) combined with short (1-min) rest periods, large increases were observed in serum GH concentraionsn. The most dramatic increases occurred in response to a 1-min rest period when the duration of exercise was longer (10 RM vs. 5 RM). Pg. 108
Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 30 May 2005 01:18 PM
I might as well have been studying in a strip club for all that I could concentrate on the reading!

Well heh?It worked for Robert Feinman! They say it's called String theory with very good reason. A lot of his Nobel prize stuff was written on beer mats!
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

chriscorreia Posted 02 June 2005 10:57 AM
If I may butt in, one might be able to find a used copy of the text at Amazon or textbooks.com (spelling may be off on that one); I saved $25 with a 10 minute search when I bought it.

Bipennate: I also find that I have a really hard time concentrating when studying; I may not be in a strip club, but I'm usually fantasizing . . . . Actually, I have too much other stuff in my head re my school/business, and taking the study time seem like stealing away from other important stuff. And yes, the early chapeter a a bit of a slog through for a non-exercise science guy.

Also, do you have the ACSM materials? If so, are they helpful for understanding the material for CSCS? Otherwise, I noted in the shoulder topic that I am not the one recently certified. I'm on the slow train. But, I will solve that problem with some regular scheduling of study time.

______________________________ ______________________________ _________________
There are no shortcuts
http://www.cloquetmartialarts.com
Posts: 40 | Registered: 01 June 2005

littlewolf Posted 02 June 2005 12:19 PM
A thought occured to me as I was reading this thread.

Most people on these forums say that personal trainers don't know ****. With that kind of a stereotype, why would anyone want to be one?

Also, how are you guys registered for one day yet have over 1000 posts.
Posts: 90 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Kwalk014
Posted 02 June 2005 12:58 PM
How long did it take you to get certified?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Current - Weight: 162, Body Fat: I dont know probably around 11 - 12 Height: 5'10 - 5' 11, Phase: Bulking, Age: 17

Goals (by Christmas Break) - Weight 175 and 9% bodyfat.
Posts: 951 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Izzy
Posted 02 June 2005 06:51 PM
Hey bip. Quick question, just got my Essentials of Personal Training. Was wondering how one would go about with studying up these materials. Am I to read the book from cover to cover, remembering every intricate detail like muscle make, different functions? I have no scientific background, except for basic sciences. Advice please. Thanks.
Posts: 241 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Izzy
Posted 02 June 2005 07:29 PM
quote:
Originally posted by littlewolf:
A thought occured to me as I was reading this thread.

Most people on these forums say that personal trainers don't know ****. With that kind of a stereotype, why would anyone want to be one?

Also, how are you guys registered for one day yet have over 1000 posts.


Like you said, "most", not all. Furthermore, some personal trainers really don't know jacksquat; don't mean all of them are like so. Personally for me, it combines a job with a passion and what more can you look for in a career?

And as for your second question, I guess we didn't lose our post count from the previous forum.
Posts: 241 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 02 June 2005 08:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by chriscorreia:
Also, do you have the ACSM materials? If so, are they helpful for understanding the material for CSCS? Otherwise, I noted in the shoulder topic that I am not the one recently certified. I'm on the slow train. But, I will solve that problem with some regular scheduling of study time.


Some of the extra materials, such as the exercise physiology books that they offer...I listed the ones that I thought were valuable on in one of the earlier posts. However, everything thsat you would basically need appears to be in the 'essentials' text, and a lot more!.

I would suggest focusing on the difficult material to make sure that you understand it, or nothing afterwards will make much sense. You can't have a true appreciation of periodization without an understanding of endocrinology, you can't really understand physiology without basic anatomy, etc.

Hang in there, Chris! You'll get it!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 02 June 2005 08:57 PM
quote:
Originally posted by littlewolf:
A thought occured to me as I was reading this thread.

Most people on these forums say that personal trainers don't know ****. With that kind of a stereotype, why would anyone want to be one?


Many trainers, unfortunately, don't. Many more do. The question is not 'why would someone want to be a trainer,' it's 'what kind of trainer do you want to be?'

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 02 June 2005 09:03 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Kwalk014:
How long did it take you to get certified?


I was new to the industry when I was originally certified through ACSM...a lot of practical experience, but not any science. ACSM is VERY heavy on science and health/medical information...if I recall, it took 3 months or so, plus a week long seminar (9-5 M-Th, test was on Friday). The ACSM HFI test was 200 (if I recall) questions, and a 3 stage practical: perform a bicycle ergometer sub-maximal VO2 max evaluation, body composition evaluation, testing, and exercise consulting, and an on-the spot program design from the results of a Par-Q form. That's why I had originally said that the HFI test might be a little more difficult than this one. It feels to me like the information for the CSCS might be a little deeper, but the actual test might be easier. But I'll have to wait and see!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 02 June 2005 09:08 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Izzy:
Hey bip. Quick question, just got my Essentials of Personal Training. Was wondering how one would go about with studying up these materials. Am I to read the book from cover to cover, remembering every intricate detail like muscle make, different functions? I have no scientific background, except for basic sciences. Advice please. Thanks.


I would read through it first, trying to understand the major points of each chapter. Get the big picture first. Everything is related: physiology, anatomy, endocrinology, cardiopulminary systems, etc, etc. Everything works together for the sole purpose of homeostasis. When you understand the big picture, it's easier to put everything else together. It's like one of those 1000 piece puzzles: if you don't use the picture on the front of the box, you're just grabbing at bits and pieces, trying to figure out what it is that you're putting together...if you know what it's supposed to look like, then the puzzle pieces start coming together before the whole picture is done! Once you have a basic appreciation of the human body, the details will make more sense to you, and will fall into place easily. (You too, Chris!)

Good luck guys...keep me posted on your progress!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Izzy
Posted 03 June 2005 08:30 AM
Actually, I skimmed through the book after finishing the first chapter(should have done it the other way round) and noticed that only the first few chapters were the killers. Afterwards, it seems to be more of the stuff I know(though needs refreshment), so it'll ease off. You're right though, I'm memorizing the stuff line for line. =P
Posts: 241 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 07 June 2005 12:08 AM
JUNE 7

God, it's late!!! Anyway, the reading has picked up again, and I'm now on page 253, 2 pages from finishing chapter 12: Nutritional Factors in Health and Performance. A few general observations, so far:
1. Coffee is your friend. I would be passing out in my book without it. However, it's also probably the reason that I'm up at 12:45am right now...oh well.
2. My study habits needed a bit of a brush up...I was finding it pretty difficult to concentrate and retain information for a few days, so I had to re-evaluate my study habits and eliminate distractions: I only study at my desk now, and not at the coffee shop. I play some jazz very quietly on the stereo, which keeps the room from being painfully silent, but not loud enough, or with lyrics to get caught up in, to be distracting (I've been listening to Keith Jarrett and George Benson, mostly).
3. I found a couple of really greatstudy strategies and tips here. There are a couple of good tips about reading speed and focus that I found really helpful!

The reading has been very interesting, however, and I'm still enjoying it. Also, one of the other guys, Pablo, decided to take the test with me on the 6th, so we'll be able to prepare together and work with eachother on the materials, which is always a good thing.

There was a whole bunch of interesting things to use for my 'fun facts,' but I thought this was particularly good as it applies to so many questions on this board (plus, I'm too tired to write anything else! )

Combining resistance and aerobic endurance activities appears to interfere primarily with strength and power performances. When programs for maximal strength and power an aerobic endurance training are done in excess, maximal power performance is impaired. Callister et al. showed that simultaneous sprint and aerobic endurance training decreased sprint speed and jump power. Possible explanations for this less-than-optimal power development include adverse neural changes and the alterations of muscle proteins in the fibers. In contrast, no adverse effects on aerobic power from heavy resistance exercise have yet been observed, despite the expected cellular changes caused by heavy resistance exercise.

The physiological mechanisms involved in such responses to simultaneous training remain unclear, but the stimulus to the muscle fiber is related to alterations in neural recruitment patterns and attenuation of muscle hypertrophy. Such attenuated adaptations may result in overtraining (i.e., decrease in performance). It is also possible that if the simultaneous training programs are properly designed, they may just require more time for strength and power to be expressed, due to the several simultaneous ultrastructural and enzymatic adaptations for multiple performance demands. Furthermore, the amount of protein accretion in certain muscle fibers may not be the same in a muscle that is being trained by high intensity training programs for both strength and aerobic endurance. Pg. 156.

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 12 June 2005 09:21 PM
JUNE 12

Well, the reading sure has picked up, now that I'm past Section I in the book! I'm up to page 393: Anaerobic Exercise Prescription, after whipping through Section II this weekend (and I still managed time to grab a beer with my friends last night! ). The reading has become much simpler, and I've been able to skim most of it, as it pertains to information that I am very familiar with (and I assume that most people taking this test would be!).

As a slight aside, I just got Biomechanical Basis of Human Movement, 2nd ed. from the ACSM. It looked very good, and I thought that it would be an excellent reference and information source, and I wasn't dissapointed! It's a fantastic book, very detailed and technical, and I'm glad that I picked it up! Those of you without physiology/anatomy and biomechanics/physics in their backgrounds might find some of the material a bit difficult to fully grasp and appreciate upon the first reading, as it is easily a college level textbook, but I would recommend it to anyone looking for a good source of information!

Fun fact of the day: Not actually a fact this time, but rather two different formulas for calculating calories. I found that comparing the slightly different values given in terms of a weight loss caloric count is very informative!

Resting energy expenditure (REE) calculations:

Male REE: 10 x weight (kg*) + (6.25 x height {cm**})-(5 x age) + 5
Female REE: 10 x weight (kg) + (6.25 x height {cm})-(5 x age)-161
Add between 10-30% of the total for estimated weight loss caloric requirements.
pg. 269

Estimated daily calorie needs of male and female athletes by activity:
Activity level needs/kg bodyweight:
Male:
Light = 38 x kg
Moderate = 41 x kg
Heavy = 50 x kg
Female:
Light = 35 x kg
Moderate = 37 x kg
Heavy = 44 x kg
pg. 253

*kg = 2.2046 pounds
**inch = 2.54cm

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 13 June 2005 07:14 AM
The originals of the formulas are in real measurements!?!!?

We'll have you boys lifting with nice coloured plastic covered plates yet!!!!

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."Albert Einstein
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Hockeyfan Posted 15 June 2005 05:36 AM
http://www.cptn.com/
bipennate,
what do you think of this site and its certification? have you heard of it? Right now I think I want to just start off with a basic certification, start working and then from there get a higher certification. So what does this one look like to you? or any other suggestions as a starter?
thanks a lot

p.s. plus if you have any advice feel free. i really don't know much about the indisutry and really need some help.
Posts: 147 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 15 June 2005 12:29 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Irishdazza:
The originals of the formulas are in real measurements!?!!?


I knew you'd like that!


quote:
We'll have you boys lifting with nice coloured plastic covered plates yet!!!!


They bounce when you drop 'em, too!!!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 15 June 2005 12:36 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Hockeyfan:
http://www.cptn.com/
bipennate,
what do you think of this site and its certification? have you heard of it? Right now I think I want to just start off with a basic certification, start working and then from there get a higher certification. So what does this one look like to you? or any other suggestions as a starter?
thanks a lot

p.s. plus if you have any advice feel free. i really don't know much about the indisutry and really need some help.


Well, I took a look at the website, and I can't say that it looked terribly impressive to me, and I think that you would probably have a pretty difficult time finding work with that cert, along with no previous experience and background in ex. science. Of course, I don't live in Canada, so I don't know anything about the Canadian fitness industry, and it could be a completely different system/environment. I would suggest asking the managers of local gyms (reputable ones, of course) and see what they say: what type of credentials do they look for when considering an applicant? Along the same lines, you could also take a look at the want ads for pt openings, and see what they list as requirements for the job.

Take a look at this thread, where a couple of us discussed becoming a pt...might be helpful:

http://forums.menshealth.com/groupee...5241#737105241

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

MikeMazz
Posted 15 June 2005 01:12 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Irishdazza:

Well heh?It worked for Robert Feinman! They say it's called String theory with very good reason. A lot of his Nobel prize stuff was written on beer mats!


I think you're thinking Richard Feynman, and it was for quantum physics...nothing with the "string theory".


Your sister is HOT, but your Mom does that thing with her tongue!
Posts: 1403 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 15 June 2005 05:22 PM
That's the bloke!!!

"Yes this experiment is to test the theory of...why Dr Feynman this is one of your theories"

"How much is it costing?"

Answer: Some ridiculous amount that would probably repay all third world debt.

"What...you don't trust me?"

Cool bloke....
__________________
Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable. -- Sidney J. Harris
Irishdazza is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2005, 04:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Irishdazza
Senior Member
 
Irishdazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 2,489
Post

June 28

I'VE FINISHED MY READING!!!

Oh, happy day! My personal statistics for the reading period: It took me 5 weeks (to the day) to complete the reading. I averaged 120 pages/week, and 16.7 pages/day. Most of my reading occurred on the weekends

I also just took the CSCS online practice exam, where I scored 32 out of 45, or 71%...not too happy about that, actually, although I did answer a few questions without really reading the question entirely, which has always been a problem of mine (I've GOT to learn to cut that crap out!!!). It indicated that I should review my anatomy/physiology (how embarassing!!! ), cardiorespiratory exercise perscription, exercise techniques (a lot of the stupid mistakes were made there, though, so I just have to remember not to rush the questions!), and measurement and evaluation modules.

Phase II will be to go through the book again, and to take notes. I will be doing this primarily by re-writing all relevant definitions and concepts so that I can have them etched into my brain...I have found that for myself, when I know a definition, I know the concept. I now have 5 weeks until my test, so I plan on devoting 3-4 weeks on this, and then leaving the last week to studying the practice exam questions themselves, which has also always been a good way for me to study. Tomorrow, I will take the 1st practice exam as well, and see if my results are similar with the online practice exam...hopefully, I will remember to be, *ahem*, less careless with my answers!

If you'd like to try the exam for yourself, go here:
http://nsca.hkeducationcenter.com/Co...fo/pretest.cfm

If you do better than I did, feel free to rip into me: I deserve it!!!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

jrgens
Posted 28 June 2005 10:49 PM
I finally found out where you got your name (mod. 2 question 4 choice A- it's what I guessed).

I got 23/45. I was hoping for a little better because I usually do well at multiple choice tests even if I have no idea what the material is. I'm lucky I guessed your name because that got me above the 50% mark.

That's really cool that you are learning that stuff. I'd really be interested in doing it myself but I'm on a path right now that I shouldn't stop if I want to be successful (not that you can't be successful as a personal trainer, they make good money). Good luck with these next five weeks and I'll definately check this thread to see how your progress is coming.
Posts: 371 | Registered: 01 June 2005

blackgecko Posted 28 June 2005 11:22 PM
Hey, anyone here Canadian and got certified??Was wondering, Bip, about the ACE test??

"I hear and forget. I see and remember. I do and I know" Confuscious

http://www.fitday.com/WebFit/PublicJ...ner=blackgecko
Posts: 133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 28 June 2005 11:52 PM
quote:
Originally posted by blackgecko:
Hey, anyone here Canadian and got certified??Was wondering, Bip, about the ACE test??


Although I never looked too hard at the ACE materials, my understanding is that the test is a 'general' test that covers a little bit of everything, but nothing too difficult. It is a good 'foot in the door' type of certification, nationally recognized, but probably not in the same category as the NSCA and ASCM. I know a lot of guys who took and received certification through ACE, and I've never heard of anyone failing, at least those that I have worked with...

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Izzy
Posted 29 June 2005 10:52 AM
Ha! I got 30 out of 45. Should have done better since quite abit of the questions are so familiar. Just can't remember the details. At least I got one part perfectly correct, Module 4. BACK TO THE BOOKS IT SEEMS~

Hey, Bip. I do have a question. For the CPT exams, do you have to memorize every single equation including the conversions? I'm looking at the protocols and norms section and it has the different testings and equations for them. Not a problem to remember, just wondering if I have to. And, have any online practice exams for CPT? Want to try a shot at it. Was also thinking of purchasing their practice exam sheets.
Posts: 241 | Registered: 01 June 2005

ChadK Posted 29 June 2005 10:52 AM
quote:
Originally posted by bipennate:
June 28

I'VE FINISHED MY READING!!!

Oh, happy day! My personal statistics for the reading period: It took me 5 weeks (to the day) to complete the reading. I averaged 120 pages/week, and 16.7 pages/day. Most of my reading occurred on the weekends

I also just took the CSCS online practice exam, where I scored 32 out of 45, or 71%...not too happy about that, actually, although I did answer a few questions without really reading the question entirely, which has always been a problem of mine (I've GOT to learn to cut that crap out!!!). It indicated that I should review my anatomy/physiology (how embarassing!!! ), cardiorespiratory exercise perscription, exercise techniques (a lot of the stupid mistakes were made there, though, so I just have to remember not to rush the questions!), and measurement and evaluation modules.

Phase II will be to go through the book again, and to take notes. I will be doing this primarily by re-writing all relevant definitions and concepts so that I can have them etched into my brain...I have found that for myself, when I know a definition, I know the concept. I now have 5 weeks until my test, so I plan on devoting 3-4 weeks on this, and then leaving the last week to studying the practice exam questions themselves, which has also always been a good way for me to study. Tomorrow, I will take the 1st practice exam as well, and see if my results are similar with the online practice exam...hopefully, I will remember to be, *ahem*, less careless with my answers!

If you'd like to try the exam for yourself, go here:
http://nsca.hkeducationcenter.com/Co...fo/pretest.cfm

If you do better than I did, feel free to rip into me: I deserve it!!!


Bip -

Do you know what constitutes a passing mark? Just curious.

============================== ============================== ====================
"Character consists of what you do on the third and fourth tries."
- Unknown

"Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it."
----- George Halas

"Setting a goal is not the main thing. It is deciding how you will go about achieving it and staying with that plan."
----- Tom Landry

Posts: 186 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 29 June 2005 11:42 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Izzy:
Ha! I got 30 out of 45. Should have done better since quite abit of the questions are so familiar. Just can't remember the details. At least I got one part perfectly correct, Module 4. BACK TO THE BOOKS IT SEEMS~

Hey, Bip. I do have a question. For the CPT exams, do you have to memorize every single equation including the conversions? I'm looking at the protocols and norms section and it has the different testings and equations for them. Not a problem to remember, just wondering if I have to. And, have any online practice exams for CPT? Want to try a shot at it. Was also thinking of purchasing their practice exam sheets.


Yeah, I got 2 or 3 perfect, but royally screwed up on the others...

Check out the NSCA website...they *might* have a practice test similar to the CSCS one (I'd love to take it and try to reclaim some of my dignity...!). Also, of course, you can purchase the practice tests, which are probably very helpful!

As far as memorizing the formulas, I don't think that it's a bad idea, but I'm not really sure what that test looks like. I *think* that the HFI test had one or two formula questions on it, and I know from people that took it that the ACE exam does, so I don't think that it's out of the question that yours will, too. Better to be safe than sorry!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 29 June 2005 11:48 AM
quote:
Originally posted by ChadK:

Bip -

Do you know what constitutes a passing mark? Just curious.


It fluctuates, but here is what the NSCA said about passing marks:

The passing rate for both sections of the CSCS exam is approximately 65%. (The percentage of candidates who pass the Scientific Foundations section is slightly higher than those passing the Practical/Applied section.) Note: To become certified, a candidate must pass both sections.

The passing rate for the NSCA-CPT exam is approximately 54%.

The minimum score for passing is a scaled score of 70. The passing scaled score reflects the amount of knowledge that a committee of experts has determined to be appropriate to designate competency on the exam. The scores are not curved; the ability to pass the exam depends upon each candidate's own knowledge, not the performance of other candidates. The performance of other candidates at any given exam site does not affect the minimum passing score.

Each year the NSCA Certification Commission modifies the exams to reflect changes in the literature and practices of the profession. The NSCA Certification Commission's exam service reviews and edits the questions for conformity to testing and measurement principles, thus assisting the NSCA Certification Commission in assembling the final version of the exam.

The reason for scaled scores is that different forms (or versions) of the test may vary in difficulty. As new forms of the test are introduced, a certain number of questions in each content area are replaced by new questions. These changes may cause one form of the test to be slightly easier or harder than another form. To adjust for these differences in difficulty, a procedure called "equating" is used. The goal of equating is to ensure fairness to all candidates.

The scaled score is statistically derived from your raw score. The passing score reflects the amount of knowledge that a committee of experts has determined to be appropriate for credentialing. A criterion-referenced standard setting procedure and expert judgment were used to evaluate each item on the entire exam in order to identify the passing point. Therefore, your score is not based on a curve; it is determined independently of all other exam candidates.

The equating system used and the manner in which the passing point is established follows psychometric protocols and nationally-recognized standards. How the NSCA Certification Commission administers and scores its exam are two reasons why the CSCS and NSCA-CPT certifications that have acquired nationally accredited status.

So, my practice exam sucked, but maybe I hypothetically just passed anyway???

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

ChadK Posted 29 June 2005 12:50 PM
Wow, I got 29/45 on the first try. That's 64.4%. I was pretty surprised since I have no formal schooling or training. My BS and MS are both in Civil Engineering, so I do have some science background though. I guess I have picked up quite a bit doing my own reading and research.

Anyway, I am sure I would have absolutely no shot at passing the practical session. What is involved?

============================== ============================== ====================
"Character consists of what you do on the third and fourth tries."
- Unknown

"Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it."
----- George Halas

"Setting a goal is not the main thing. It is deciding how you will go about achieving it and staying with that plan."
----- Tom Landry

Posts: 186 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Izzy
Posted 29 June 2005 01:33 PM
Hey bip, this is O/T but I've been meaning to ask you this. I've cut out cardio for about 8 weeks now and am just restarting it. However, when I started running and jumping rope as of late, the midpoint of my sole HURTS. It's like a strain that doesn't want to go away. I've tried to walk it off and ignore it but it keeps coming back to the point where I can't do it no more. Should I just see if my foot adapts or is there some kind of stretching I should be doing? There was an injury list in this month's Men's Health and it sort of suited my problem. They classified it as "Plantar fasciitis" but I'm not sure it's the same. Whatcha think?
Posts: 241 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 29 June 2005 02:01 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Izzy:
Hey bip, this is O/T but I've been meaning to ask you this. I've cut out cardio for about 8 weeks now and am just restarting it. However, when I started running and jumping rope as of late, the midpoint of my sole HURTS. It's like a strain that doesn't want to go away. I've tried to walk it off and ignore it but it keeps coming back to the point where I can't do it no more. Should I just see if my foot adapts or is there some kind of stretching I should be doing? There was an injury list in this month's Men's Health and it sort of suited my problem. They classified it as "Plantar fasciitis" but I'm not sure it's the same. Whatcha think?


I was thinking 'plantar fasciitis' the entire time...Orthodics work well in correcting it. I would suggest a podiatrist, as this is a common overuse injury. It's not a big deal: I use orthodics myself. Makes me taller! Woo-hoo!!!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 29 June 2005 02:06 PM
quote:
Originally posted by ChadK:
Wow, I got 29/45 on the first try. That's 64.4%. I was pretty surprised since I have no formal schooling or training. My BS and MS are both in Civil Engineering, so I do have some science background though. I guess I have picked up quite a bit doing my own reading and research.

Anyway, I am sure I would have absolutely no shot at passing the practical session. What is involved?


Nice job, Chad...like I said, I imploded on that practical...here's the layout of the test, including practical:

CSCS Exam Format
To earn the CSCS credential, candidates must pass a rigorous exam comprised of two sections: Scientific Foundations and Practical/Applied.

Scientific Foundations

The Scientific Foundations section, which is 1.5 hours in length, consists of 80 multiple-choice questions designed to assess a candidate's knowledge in the areas of exercise sciences (anatomy, exercise physiology, biomechanics, etc.) and nutrition.


Scientific Foundations
Domain Percent of Exam Section Number of Questions
Exercise Science 72.5% 58
Nutrition 27.5% 22
Total 100% 80

Length of exam section 1.5 hours


Exercise Sciences: anatomy, bioenergetics, exercise physiology, biomechanics, acute and chronic adaptations to anaerobic and aerobic exercise, etc.


Nutrition: factors affecting health and sport performance

Practical/Applied


The Practical/Applied section, which is 2.5 hours in length, consists of 110 multiple-choice questions pertaining to program design, exercise techniques, testing and evaluation and organization/administration. Forty of these are in conjunction with a video, which mainly assesses competencies in exercise techniques, functional anatomy and testing procedures.

Practical/Applied
Section and Domain Percent of Exam Section Number of Questions
Exercise Technique 35.5% 39
Program Design 35.5% 39
Organization and Administration 9% 10
Testing and Evaluation 20% 22
Total 100% 110

Number of video questions
(already included in the total) 40
Length of exam section 2.5 hours


Exercise Technique: correct flexibility, conditioning, plyometric and resistance training exercise techniques

Program Design: anaerobic and aerobic training programs based upon an athlete’s sport, strength and conditioning levels and training goals

Organization and Administration: policies and procedures, staffing, layout and safety guidelines of a strength and conditioning facility

Testing and Evaluation: proper performance test selection, administration and evaluation of results based on the athlete’s sport, strength and conditioning levels and training goals

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

ChadK Posted 29 June 2005 02:19 PM
Oh, I thought the practical session was a hands-on test, of sorts.

Anyway, all of this talk makes me want to buy some study materials and take this test sometime so I can become a CSCS. Right now I don't really have any use for it, but maybe I could do something on the side or maybe even go for a career switch in the future.

I think there are continuing education courses you have to take to keep your certification every so many years, though. Is that correct, Bip?

============================== ============================== ====================
"Character consists of what you do on the third and fourth tries."
- Unknown

"Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it."
----- George Halas

"Setting a goal is not the main thing. It is deciding how you will go about achieving it and staying with that plan."
----- Tom Landry

Posts: 186 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 29 June 2005 02:35 PM
quote:
Originally posted by ChadK:
Oh, I thought the practical session was a hands-on test, of sorts.

Anyway, all of this talk makes me want to buy some study materials and take this test sometime so I can become a CSCS. Right now I don't really have any use for it, but maybe I could do something on the side or maybe even go for a career switch in the future.

I think there are continuing education courses you have to take to keep your certification every so many years, though. Is that correct, Bip?


Nope, the practical isn't hands on, but it is exercise evaluation and assesment, which could be difficult if you've never really experienced that before. The ACSM HFI test, however, had a huge hands on practical component. They've changed it since I took it, but when I sat for the test, it was (I think) 200 questions, PLUS the practical: conducting a submax VO2 cardiovascular stress test using ACSM protocols; 7 point body fat caliper testing and body circumference measurement, stretching and strengthening demonstration for random muscle groups; and a stress test result evaluation and program design, indicating potential counterindications for exercise and risk stratifications (this is what they have changed: now, instead of this, the exercise demonstration and instruction segment is expanded).

Personally, I think that the HFI is probably a much more difficult test, but the materials covered are potentially more difficult for the CSCS, in general. Another difference is that you cannot even sit for the HFI unless you have an exercise related degree, but you just need a college degree for the CSCS, regardless of field of study.

And yes, you need to amass continuing ed credits for any certification. Each cert has different standards/requirements in types and amounts, but generally you can get CEU's for attending national conferences, taking self tests, taking college level exercise science courses, and/or publishing articles in journals, teaching college courses in ex. science, or speaking at conferences.

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 30 June 2005 10:43 PM
JUNE 30

I just finished my first official practice exam...and I passed! Passing was 70%, and I got 73%, passing both sections (scientific foundations and practical/applied). I also passed every individual section (Exercise sciences, exercise techniques, Program design, organization/administration [aced that part!], and testing evaluation). I missed passing the nutrition section by 1 question (although I still disagree with the answer that they gave , but was able to pass the section itself regardless).

I feel pretty good about this, considering that I haven't even started the actual studying, I just read through the book. I now have 5 weeks before the test: I give myself about 2 weeks to take notes, another 2-2.5 to study those notes, and then the final 3-7 days before the test to drill the practice exam questions (all of the questions that I have access to, including the online test...which, incidentally, I don't feel so bad about now if 70% is a passing mark!...ok, ok, it still sucked! )

So far, so good!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

walt
Posted 30 June 2005 11:16 PM
BIP you amaze me. Just reading some of the posts you've made from your reading, how you keep all that in your head is unbelievable. I'm sure by the time the test comes you'll pass with flying colors. You definitely have the dedication for it just keep up what you're doing and you'll ace it.You're already an impressive bank of applicable knowledge. Keep on bud you've made quite a name for yourself on this little board wait till you go public. I call dibs on a copy of your first book. I just wonder what big fitness guru you'll knock off the totem pole and take the place of in the future?
Posts: 177 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 30 June 2005 11:20 PM
quote:
Originally posted by walt:
I just wonder what big fitness guru you'll knock off the totem pole and take the place of in the future?


I got my sights set on John Basedow!!!

Thanks for the kind words, Walt! I'm sure trying!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Raymond3
Posted 09 July 2005 10:19 AM
Hey Bip, coming in here late, but just read the whole thread. Man you know your ish pretty good. They need to have more PT's like you...my view of most of them is that they know the basics, text book stuff, but are lacking passion. You show both the skills and the passion, which is uncommon, at least from what Ive experienced. Just wanted to say good luck to you and wish you the best

Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle.
Posts: 557 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 09 July 2005 04:04 PM
Thanks, Ray! I really appreciate that!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 18 July 2005 11:05 PM
July 18

Hmm...It's been a little bit since I've updated. Well, I hit a slight bump in my planning: it's taken A LOT longer to write up my notes than I had originally thought it would, and there's no way that I'll be able to finish them for the entire book...So far, I have finished 218 pages and written 16 pages (front AND back, for a total of 32) of notes. Therefore, I've altered my strategy: I will take as many notes as I can until a week from today. Then, I will drill those notes for a week, and then use my final week drilling the notes AND the practice exams. I feel confidant, so hopefully this will be enough.

In the least, I need to finish 50 more pages to complete the exercise sciences section (the first half of the book). The rest has to do with exercise testing, program design, plyometrics, etc, etc. but I'm not too worried about that.

19 days until the big day!!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 19 July 2005 02:37 AM
Keep up the good work Bip- and remember if you write the notes inside your arm above the cuff line - you dnn't need to study!

(You have long arms, right? Well maybe you could write small...)

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."Albert Einstein
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Izzy
Posted 19 July 2005 12:52 PM
You'll do great Bip, I got no worries for you. My CPT will be in about 30 days, still havent' finished with the dang book(been in and out of town for the past 2 weeks). I'm gonna finish it by this week though, and I'll have roughly 3 weeks or so to finish it all. Haven't done a practice exam yet, but I do have notes already so that's a save. CPT is definitely easier than your CSCS so I'm not too worried, but still feelig a little scrambling at the moment. Anyways, I wanna wish you good luck, but you obviously don't need it.
Posts: 241 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 19 July 2005 05:13 PM
Thanks guys! I'm super anxious to take the test already! I just want to get it over with so that I can make up new business cards, you know?

Izzy, you're going to rock that test...I have no doubt about it! You've been living and breathing that book for the past month!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Kaiser Soze
Posted 19 July 2005 05:19 PM
Good luck with the test, bip!

(small paper rolled inside a Bic pen always worked for me)


Posts: 472 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 28 July 2005 09:01 PM
JULY 28

a little over a week left...this week, after having a fantastically productive weekend, has slowed down a bit (a lot of work this week), and I find myself behind my schedule once again. However, if I'm productive again this weekend like I was last weekend, I won't be concerned. I also plan on freeing up my schedule next week to allow me more time to study. I am basically finished with my notes, and just need to start to review them. I've covered 478 pages, and written a little over 26 pages (again, front and back). That's A LOT of notes!!!

After the weekend's studying, 'phase three' begins, where I study off of my notes and the sample tests. I have two full practice exams, the chapter questions in the book, the sample exam questions that I posted earlier of of the website, as well as 5 other sample questions that I dug up on the Certification Commission website. That's a lot of questions to drill, so I still feel pretty good!

Of course, if all else fails, I can always write out answers on the inside of my arm above the cuff line, as well as making a small sheet of paper rolled up inside of my bic!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 29 July 2005 12:24 PM
Keep up the good work mate!

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."Albert Einstein
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

jward99
Posted 02 August 2005 01:17 PM
Hey Bip, I had a quick question about the NSPA test. I was looking into doing the NSCA-CPT to become a part-time trainer. My friend, who has a related college degree and does this stuff for a living said the NSPA would be better and would get me a job faster.

BTW-I tried a search for the NSPA and nothing came up.

Thanks

I wish I was in "HALF" as good as shape as they "THINK" they are.

"You know I don't like classically beautiful women. Give me a nice nose break or a lazy eye" - Johnny Drama
Posts: 256 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 02 August 2005 09:44 PM
quote:
Originally posted by jward99:
Hey Bip, I had a quick question about the NSPA test. I was looking into doing the NSCA-CPT to become a part-time trainer. My friend, who has a related college degree and does this stuff for a living said the NSPA would be better and would get me a job faster.

BTW-I tried a search for the NSPA and nothing came up.

Thanks


Huh? The NSPA??? I have never heard of that! Are you he didn't say the NFPT (National Federation of Professional Trainers, http://www.NFPT.com) or IFPA? The Big ones are the ACSM and NSCA, followed by ACE, NASM, AFAA, and the ISSA. I wouldn't even consider the NFPT or IFPA (and have never met anyone certified through those two). Truth is, I wouldn't consider anything but the first 4 that I listed, in all honesty...Not sure what your friend is thinking...

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 02 August 2005 09:51 PM
August 2

Just re-took the first practice exam, as well as all 162 end-of-the-chapter questions in the book: I scored 80% on my re-take (up by 7% and 4 questions, although I was actually down one in exercise techniques!!! ) and I scored 85% of the book questions (137 right, although I was a bit annoyed at that, because I was running a 90% for the first 18 out of 26 chapters... )

Also, my poorest section the first time around, nutrition, was actually one of my strongest: 7/7 correct this time! Not bad!

I might take the online exam again tonight as well, but I'll probably just read through notes instead, and go over what I screwed up. I took the afternoon and evening off of work for tomorrow, so I'll have all day to take more tests. Feeling pretty good, though! 3 days to go!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

jward99
Posted 03 August 2005 08:32 AM
quote:
Originally posted by bipennate:
Huh? The NSPA??? I have never heard of that! Are you he didn't say the NFPT (National Federation of Professional Trainers, http://www.NFPT.com) or IFPA? The Big ones are the ACSM and NSCA, followed by ACE, NASM, AFAA, and the ISSA. I wouldn't even consider the NFPT or IFPA (and have never met anyone certified through those two). Truth is, I wouldn't consider anything but the first 4 that I listed, in all honesty...Not sure what your friend is thinking...


Yeah..here's the link:
http://nspainc.com/

It seems to be associated with a local gym started by John Philbin. The one good thing about this site seems to be a job listing page, but other than that I will probably tell my friend that I'll stick with the NSCA. Thanks for the input.

I wish I was in "HALF" as good as shape as they "THINK" they are.

"You know I don't like classically beautiful women. Give me a nice nose break or a lazy eye" - Johnny Drama
Posts: 256 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 03 August 2005 04:33 PM
August 3

quote:
Originally posted by bipennate:
June 28


I also just took the CSCS online practice exam, where I scored 32 out of 45, or 71%...not too happy about that, actually, although I did answer a few questions without really reading the question entirely, which has always been a problem of mine (I've GOT to learn to cut that crap out!!!). It indicated that I should review my anatomy/physiology (how embarassing!!! ), cardiorespiratory exercise perscription, exercise techniques (a lot of the stupid mistakes were made there, though, so I just have to remember not to rush the questions!), and measurement and evaluation modules.


Second time around: MUCH BETTER! I scored 84%, 38 out of 45. I feel much better now! I still sucked on the last module (which is so damned embarassing, because I got an A in statistics...shows how much I've retained!), but all-in-all, I'm good with that! I've been hitting 80-85's so far, so I would be shocked if that type of score isn't good enough to pass! The problem is, my boss scored a 93 when he took it (right before he graduated from grad school in exercise physiology), and I need to beat him!!!

On to the second practice test!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 03 August 2005 05:26 PM
August 3

Nice! Scored 81%, 52 out of 64, one question better than the re-take of the first test from last night. And I've never seen these questions before (not that I remembered any of the others...), so I feel really good! I passed ALL domains/categories, although I didn't ace any of them this time around (the closest that I came was nutrition, ex techniques and organization, where I got 1 wrong for each).

I'll probably take all of the book questions again, and really start to study off of them, instead of just taking them as a practice. 2.5 days of study left, and I'm feeling very positive!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 04 August 2005 11:18 PM
August 5

32 hours to go!!! I'll be working at the physical therapist's tomorrow between 8-1, then I'll be driving up to NY and staying at my best friend's apartment in NY before the test. I'm counting on about 5-7 hours of a final push before the big event. I feel really good though! I think I'm ready!

8am Saturday, August 6, Pace University, Midtown Manhattan.

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 05 August 2005 12:28 PM
Good man Bip...we're rooting for ya!

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."Albert Einstein
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

MikeMazz
Posted 05 August 2005 12:30 PM
Good Luck Bip!


Your sister is HOT, but your Mom does that thing with her tongue!
Posts: 1403 | Registered: 01 June 2005

jrgens
Posted 05 August 2005 01:42 PM
Good luck Bipennate.

Just be as confident in yourself as all of us are confident that you'll have no problem.
Posts: 371 | Registered: 01 June 2005

calimon
Posted 05 August 2005 02:20 PM
Good Luck Jon

Age: 29 Weight: 172 BF%: 15 Goals Weight: 180 BF%: 10%
Posts: 728 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 06 August 2005 03:12 PM
August 6---The Big Day

Wow. Ok, so here's what happened:

I was SUPPOSED to wake up at 6:30 for my 8am test, but of course I was awake at around 5:45...I got up, ate breakfast, and got dressed. My best friend, whose apartment I crashed at (she lives uptown) made me a mix of the 'Garden State Soundtrack' and put it onto her MP3 player for me: VERY relaxing songs, and it really helped me to stay calm while taking the subway downtown! With coffee in hand, I got off of the subway at about 7:15, and sat in the park and read my notes for about 20 minutes, then moved to the Starbucks across the street. I ran into someone else preparing for the test (turns out that he was taking the CPT, not CSCS), and he had been studying since JANUARY...!!! I don't know how hard this stuff is, but I couldn't imagine preparing for that long!

I walked into the building promptly at 8am, only to discover that I probably should have read the instructions a bit more carefully: the test was scheduled to start at 8:30, not 8. I'm a dumb@$$!

Of course, it didn't actually start at 8:30 either: By the time we cracked open the test booklets, it was 9:30. At this point, the morning coffee has gone through my bladder like a bullet train, and considering the fact that I already have the bladder size of a walnut and the control of a pregnant dog, it was amazing that I didn't explode in the test room!

First half: 80 questions, primarily exercise science. MUCH harder than any of the practice questions that I had been drilling with! I would say, on average, they were roughly twice as hard as the online questions that I posted the link to last month! Most of them were fair, however: you just had to really understand your physiology so that you could construct the situation described in your head and deduce the answer. There were very few straightforward questions. Of course, there were some completely off-the-wall, couldn't even recall seeing it in the book-type questions which I had to reach deep into my experience to even come close to answering, but all-in-all, I felt pretty good. I was reading a little during the one hour break, and came across the answers to a few of the questions that I had been unsure of, and I was right on all counts, so I felt decent.

Part two started with the video practical: that was a joke! Very easy questions, mostly form and technique, and I felt very confident with my answers, for the most part. In fact, I felt pretty good about the second half of the test (110 questions) all-together!

Did I 'ace' it? Probably not: I'm sure that I made a number of mistakes that I'm unaware of. But I would be very dissapointed if I have not passed. But you never know. I spoke with a number of individuals that were taking the test for the 2nd time, so I don't want to be too confident. Hopefully, that won't be me, but if it is, then I'll just have to go back and study some more!

Advice for those who plan on taking the CSCS: KNOW YOUR PHYSIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINE AND ADAPTIVE RESPONSE TO EXERCISE!!! Lot's of questions based on that material. And you really need to understand it, not just have definitions memorized. There were a fair number of detail questions as well, but nothing too random. If I passed it, I definitely earned it!!!

Thanks to all of the guys who posted warm wishes! I really appreciate it, and I hope that everyone has enjoyed this account of my test experience. I will be getting results in about 6-8 weeks, according to the testing service...now, it's just sit back and wait...

But tonight, I'm going out and having a drink!!!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Northernlion Posted 06 August 2005 04:42 PM
Congrats!

Also, props for the Garden State soundtrack. Good music from one of the best movies of last year.
Posts: 355 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 06 August 2005 04:48 PM
Have more than one - even have one on me!

But stay in range of the restrooms?

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."Albert Einstein
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Dragns
Posted 06 August 2005 04:51 PM
Congrats on getting that done! Sounds like a ***** of a test. When will you know the results?

______________________________ ____
Anima Sana In Corpore Sano
Posts: 1646 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 06 August 2005 04:56 PM
Yo Dragns! Long time no read...

How's the running going?

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."Albert Einstein
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Dragns
Posted 06 August 2005 05:15 PM
Hey Irish... yeah, i've been kinda absent lately.

The running is going good. Marathon is in about two months. Runs are tough lately because it's been so damn hot here - like 90's everyday, plus I've been having my son every weekend, all weekend, because of his mom's work schedule, and it's hard to get him motivated to ride his bike with me while I'm doing 15 miles or whatever. He even went so far as to get his mom involved and she told me that she didn't want him riding that far. Whatever. He's here, he's mine, he's ridin'. LOL

On a positive note, I met this really hot girl on the Oxygen site and she's coming down and doing the marathon with me! woohooo!

______________________________ ____
Anima Sana In Corpore Sano
Posts: 1646 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 06 August 2005 05:58 PM
What about the race?

Glad to hear it's going well...good weather has me thinking of running again, but a 45sq mile island is a bit of a patience challenge!

Don't make the kid hate exercise now....run round a girls school sports field!

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."Albert Einstein
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 07 August 2005 06:39 AM
That's what I love about Irish: Always thinking!!! However, you won't be happy to know, but I was so exhausted from the stress and lack of sleep, combined with the fact that I had to be up early again this morning to go with my father and cousin to a classic car show in Pennsylvania, that I didn't make it out last night...On top of this, while watching last night's UFC, I was showing my other cousin (we're the same age) the possibilities available when on the ground with the opponent in guard (he never trained in wrestling), and I gave myself a nasty strain in my right adductor (Brevis, probably). The important thing is that I submitted him (And I don't even know with what! It was like a kimora, but in a low arm bar position....He's a strong bastard and has an idea of what to do, so my original plan of just sweeping around and getting a side crank or reaer-naked choke wasn't working. I had started to go for a leg wrap around his throught at one point after a failed triangle, he moved, I brought him to his side, wrapped the arm, twisted it like a kimora, applied pressure and arched...he tapped!). So, while I may have injured myself and this will effect my working out for another damned week, I won, and this is all that matters!!!

Hey Dragns...they told us that we would have scores (by mail) in 6-8 weeks. I'm hoping that's conservative, and I'll get them in 4, but I'm not counting on it...Sitting around and waiting is not the most exciting thing in the world!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Irishdazza
Posted 07 August 2005 08:13 AM


I think I'll just stick to punching and kicking...seems safer. What is it Tank Abbot used to say?

"When I lose, I'm in the bar ten minutes later having a drink. The guy who beat me is on his way to the hospital to have his through a straw"

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."Albert Einstein
Posts: 1559 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Izzy
Posted 07 August 2005 10:47 AM
quote:
Originally posted by bipennate:
I ran into someone else preparing for the test (turns out that he was taking the CPT, not CSCS), and he had been studying since JANUARY...!!! I don't know how hard this stuff is, but I couldn't imagine preparing for that long!


Neither can I. My test is in 2 weeks and I'm shaking like a leaf. Been busy with trying to find work and I screwed up my left arm from giving plasma. I knew something was wrong with the procedure the moment the damn needle was injected. Told one of the nurses and she just poked around and didn't do anything. I now have a 12 inch bruise on my left arm and it's as sore as a hippie monkey's crack.

I'm drilling the rest of this stuff in. Damn, I'm kinda unsure of myself at this moment. I took some of the questions in the book but haven't tried any of the sample tests yet. I can only imagine how badly I'll do compared to the guy who's been studying since January. I've been thinking of this question as of late; how /hard/ is the CPT exam?

Anyways, I got a question;

"Inferior angle of scapula protrude slightly from body."

"A winged scapula condition indicates a definite serratus anterior weakness."

Could ya explain what the two statements mean? I'm having a hard time trying to find a free online muscle anatomy chart. I'm poor(selling plasma kinda shows that) and so I'm cheap. =P

Thanks in advance.

Izzy
Posts: 241 | Registered: 01 June 2005

Izzy
Posted 07 August 2005 10:57 AM
Oh and Bip, congrats on the test. I'm saying congrats in advance cause I'm sure you'll pass it. So any discounts for us Men's Health Forum members who wanna pay for your CSCS services? =P

I was watching the Exercise Techniques DVD, the shoulder press exercise. It stated to lower the bar till it touches the chest(with the chest held up and out). It was the same for the dumbbells. Somebody also mentioned a few days back that lowering the weight to, lower than upper arm parallel to the ground, puts undue stress on the shoulder. He also stated that during the shoulder presses, the weight should only be lowered till the upper arms are paralleled to the floor.

Who is right? I'm guessing the DVD since it's from the NSCA. However, I'm also wondering if he's stating this cause it's a modification for a special group(injured shoulder, etc).

Anyone knows the answer? Thanks.
Posts: 241 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 07 August 2005 04:07 PM
http://www.exrx.net/Articulations/Scapula.html

Good old exrx.net to the rescue, Izzy! These are two reference points on the shoulder blades: the superior angle (the uppermost bend at the medial border) and the inferior angle on the medial border. The scapula, which are floating bones attached to muscle, used as leverage support for muscle action that effects the humerus, rotates according to arm movement. Try this: have your gf/friend/whoever stand in front of you, shirt off, and rotate their arm up, down, etc. and watch their shoulder blade, or even place your palm on their upper back/scapula. You will see the bone moving. The reference point is spine/middle of the back. Therefore, when you raise your arm, and the superior angle rotates inwards, it is called a superior rotation. When you rotate your arm downwards and the inferior angle moves in towards the spine, it is an inferior rotation.

Because the scapula are only attached to muscle, when you have a protrusion, it means that one of those muscular attachments is being overpowered and/or is weaker than the others. Scapular winging of the inferior border means that the anterior serratus (the 'fingertip' muscles at the top of your ribcage), which insert on the medial border and anterior surface of the scapula, are weak and are allowing the shoulder blades to 'wing' because they aren't exerting enough force to over come the pull of the traps/rhomboids.

As far as the shoulder press, a full ROM shoulder press is counterindicated for certain shoulder pathologies, but in general it is safe to perform. A shoulder press behind the neck has far more injury risk associated with it than does a standard shoulder press, and should be avoided except for sport-specific movements. Regardless, as far as the test is concerned: whatever the NSCA says is law!!! You can 'adjust' your methods afterwards, but know exactly what the NSCA says for your answers. And don't sweat it, Izzy: take some practice exams, get used to the format, assume the test will be twice as hard, and know your chapters, from the big picture (VERY important, because, at least on my test, there were very few straightforward questions) and make sure that you are able to fill in the details.

You've got 2 weeks: plenty of time! Just stay focused, and do your best!

______________________________ _____________________
If a fool casts a stone into a lake, ten wise men cannot pull it out ---
My CSCS Blog: http://forums.menshealth.com/eve/ubb...21/m/489107041



Posts: 2133 | Registered: 01 June 2005

bipennate
Posted 07 August 2005 04:09 PM
But as far as discounts to the MH board? Well, we'll see about that...
__________________
Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable. -- Sidney J. Harris
Irishdazza is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-27-2005, 04:39 PM   #3 (permalink)
Irishdazza
Senior Member
 
Irishdazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Posts: 2,489
Post

quote:
Originally posted by bipennate:
http://www.exrx.net/Articulations/Scapula.html

Good old exrx.net to the rescue, Izzy! These are two reference points on the shoulder blades: the superior angle (the uppermost bend at the medial border) and the inferior angle on the medial border. The scapula, which are floating bones attached to muscle, used as leverage support for muscle action that effects the humerus, rotates according to arm movement. Try this: have your gf/friend/whoever stand in front of you, shirt off, and rotate their arm up, down, etc. and watch their shoulder blade, or even place your palm on their upper back/scapula. You will see the bone moving. The reference point is spine/middle of the back. T