JP Fitness Forums powered by fitness insite  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums > Fitness > Training Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Training Discussion Ask workout questions or share your knowledge.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2009, 04:08 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9
Default The Importance Of Power Training For Any Goal

For too long power training has been the domain of Olympic Lifters and elite sportsmen.

Even many top level athletes are directed away from weight training because in the belief it will slow them down.

Many boxers are misinformed that weight training will cause them to add bulk which will either slow them down or play havoc with remaining in a particular weight division.

Runners are also told weight training leads to slower muscle contractions and greater bulk which will reduce their times as they haul ass around a middle to long distance race.

Whilst these suggestions can be true, it is only in the case of bad programming using 1970’s bodybuilding programs which are indeed counter productive in the sports arena.

A properly designed resistance training program is in fact critical to optimising potential and achieving almost any goal.

Here is why power training should feature in every program:

Runners

Most runners struggle to finish a race strongly because of a lack of sufficient power endurance in the legs which leads to reduced stride length, not because of poor stamina or endurance capabilities.

Watch any half marathon and you’ll see many people complain that they have ‘nothing in their legs’ at the end of a race yet they are able to maintain a solid conversation as soon as they cross the line because they are not panting for oxygen.

A combination of poor strength endurance and inefficient running economy can be the difference between a good runner and a top athlete and both can be improved through power training.

A study into the effect of explosive training on runners such as plyometrics with bodyweight only, fast repetitions against 0-40% of 1RM and sprints, showed enhanced 5km times with no change in V02 max (the standard indicator of cardiovascular performance).

The runners concerned had 33% of their running training replaced with THE explosive resistance training, so they were running less but performing better in a test situation over 5km.

Similarly over 14 weeks, a group of well-trained runners followed a program of concurrent endurance running with power training using weights of >90% of their 1RM. Again, they experienced gains in leg strength and power and improvements to running economy with no change in aerobic capacity. (Unfortunately no time trial tests were conducted but improvements are highly likely to have occurred due to improved running economy).

This makes interesting reading for those who either get bored by just running all the time or who are frustrated at plateau’s in run times over any distance.

In this case, exercises such as bounding, power lunges (bodyweight and against resistance), jump squats (bodyweight and against resistance), multi-directional single leg jumps, power cleans, and kettlebell swings and snatches are highly effective.

Power-based exercises enable the runner to train their ability to effectively decelerate and accelerate on each stride, prolonging the time to fatigue. They are also critical for developing stability in the lower limbs under the considerable downward forces experienced during running.

Traditional stability exercises clearly have their place in a training program but stabilizing joints in a static situation (such as single leg squats) does not in anyway guarantee stability during running.

At the moment each foot is planted, downward forces are 6-8 times that of bodyweight, and deceleration of bodyweight and stabilisation of the joints requires specific power training as detailed above.

Wobbling on a glorified ‘woopee cushion’ won’t get the job done!

This applies not only to competitive runners but sportsmen and women of all disciplines who are required to have the ability to stabilise their joints and power off in any direction in a split second.

Fat Loss

Few people looking to shed some pounds have any desire to increase their power clean or hang snatch, especially beginners. Fair enough.

However, the use of power exercises of different forms are critical to ensure rapid and consistent fat loss results.

Without simplifying the matter too much (although it is often unnecessarily complicated), fat loss requires building muscle and burning fat through resistance training, clean nutrition and perhaps cardio interval training. For some, aerobic exercise may be added if the time and energy levels are there for some extra calorie burning but this is rarely necessary nor productive.

Whatever your beliefs regarding sets and reps for fat loss the fact remains that the heavier the weight that can be lifted for that chosen rep scheme, the greater the stress on the muscle and the greater the intensity of post-exercise recovery thus elevating metabolic rate.

For instance, where all other factors remain equal, a man who can squat 80kg for 8 reps will experience results faster than an identical man who can squat 65kg for 8 reps. The difference can only be eliminated quickly through increases in strength and power which won’t come fast enough simply by trying to add 5lbs to the bar each week within the 8-10 rep range.

To a certain extent, working within a particular rep scheme will bring a degree of strength gain but not nearly as fast as when power training movements are included.

Introducing exercises which improve neurological firing patterns and consequently muscle recruitment, means heavier weights can be lifted for more reps in any given set.

More advanced trainees needing to shed some pounds can use many exercises such as variations of power cleans, snatches, jerks and plyometrics as well as medicine ball exercises like slams and overhead throws.

However, clearly most of these are impractical for beginners. This should not discourage a trainer or enthusiast from using ‘power’ training as there are many options which can be used without the need for high skill levels.

For example, using isometric contractions at different angles of the movement (particularly those where the person is weakest).

When trying to improve the contractile force of a muscle, using contractions in which the tension is built rapidly over 3-5 seconds can lead to fast gains in muscle fibre recruitment and thus power and ultimately increases in the weights that can be used in the training program.

For instance, if a person is unable to perform full push ups because they lose all strength at the bottom of the movement, using isometric pushes against a wall through various ranges can help develop the necessary strength and power in the muscle to help with the main exercise.

The ‘fat loss’ program thus becomes much more effective, much faster (assuming clean nutrition is being adhered to!)

Power can be defined as the ability to exert maximum muscular contraction instantly in an explosive burst of movements. The two components of power are strength and speed (www.brianmac.co.uk)

Developing power does not necessarily have to involve Olympic lifts or bounding up and down an athletics track, but can have dramatic results in beginners and advanced trainees alike looking for fat loss, when programmed correctly.

Muscle Building[/b]

In talking about fat loss, we’ve seen why power training improves the ability to lift heavier weights through any rep range.

It therefore doesn’t take much more explanation to see why it is also imperative for those looking for increased muscle size.

Either performing strength and power work at lower rep ranges at the start of each session or building in cycles of strength training will work.

Muscle gain may be somewhat slower compared to a ‘hypertrophy only’ phase but will set you in much greater stead for another acceleration of size in 4-6 weeks time!

The Westside barbell club is famous for it’s use of ‘speed’ deadlifts, squats and bench press to improve the core lifts. There is a lot more to this method than people think but the concept is based around performing power movements with light weights 2-3 days before performing the ‘big lift’, benefitting from neurological carryovers.

For instance, I might perform deadlifts at 50% of my 1RM for 6x2 reps on Monday, then go for PR on the Wednesday or Thursday performing ‘normal’ deadlifts.

This can be used to improve pure strength, or the performance of sets in the hypertrophy range thus aiding muscle growth.

Also, power training by its very nature requires work to be done by the ‘fast-twitch’ fibres of the working muscle. These fibres have much greater potential for growth and so stimulation of the nervous patterns that control them will be of great benefit to those seeking muscle growth.



It is clear therefore that no matter what the goal is, power training should play a key role. It is my belief that power exercises should be an ever-present element in any training program and not ignored for long periods of time as in traditional periodisation models.

Clearly different sports will place less or more importance on power in improving performance and within each sport this the need will change throughout the training year.

For some, a set or two at the start of each strength and conditioning session will suffice to maintain fast muscle-firing patterns, whereas for other sports it will be a major priority thus taking up a large proportion of training time.

For instance a triathlete may focus on strength and power through resistance training during the off-season from November to December time before converting these new capabilities as they begin to return to higher volumes of swimming, cycling and running. However, they should maintain a low volume of power training even during the competitive season.

Under no circumstances should power training be ignored for optimal physical performance regardless of age, gender or goal.

Even a 75 year old lady looking to simply improve quality of life needs the ability to get up and down easily and react to unstable situations which could lead to injury. This is based trained through power-based movements which develop or at least maintain fast muscle-recruitment!

The exercises will change, the degree of difficulty will change but the fact remains that every human being needs the ability to generate power effectively both in daily life and in sport.

Jon Le Tocq, Storm Force Fitness
JonLeTocq is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 05:50 AM   #2 (permalink)
Who Blew Poo?
 
gobbla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,054
Default

I think you'd do better picking an audience and writing towards that.

a: "runners" is too broad. Your lead in mentions half marathons and your support study is 5k. Several times you're using the term generically and it takes way from either your original point or your credibility (the longer the distance the less likely doing a specialized workout is going to matter).

b: power training (and epoc for that matter) for fat loss(are) is retarded. eat less, expend more. Regardless of how much you can lift you're never going to lift as much as you could burn on a stationary bike. Additionally you're not going to be able to perform the stimulus as often...getting less results over the same time period.

c: again, define your audience. beginners don't need dynamic lifting days. and tossing one in there isn't going to help them. at the very least it's not going to help them more than extra weekly volume per lift, either in size or strength.

b:
gobbla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 03:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
tattooed phat man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 202
Default

most recreational runners who participate in races are running 5k or longer. when somebody wins races 5k or longer in the olympics or world championships and credits strength training, others will follow. until that happens, recreational runners seeking faster times will run more miles because that's what the elites do.
tattooed phat man is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 03:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
will fight you
 
PowerManDL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bizarro World, down near Rand McNally
Posts: 2,724
Default

You seem to be flip-flopping between "getting stronger" and "power training".

Normally I wouldn't care but this is something of a pet-peeve for me. Power training is a very specific method of training with a very specific goal. It has nothing (OK, little) to do with getting stronger, but the two are conflated by just about every damn body.

Power training is working to increase either 1) the rate of doing work (for endurance sports) or 2) force with respect to velocity (in acyclic sports, like Olympic weightlifting or throwing)

Too many people make it colloquial and just have "power" equal "strength", but they are separate terms with separate meanings.
__________________

Articles | Blog | Pirate my book.
"Yeah, but you did your post grad thesis on trolling, so you don't count."
-JP, endorsing how awesome I am
PowerManDL is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 06:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
1st Dan Chito-Ryu
 
tonester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbla View Post
Regardless of how much you can lift you're never going to lift as much as you could burn on a stationary bike.
I'm only posting this as a point of interest and not to argue anything. I'm not qualified to argue here.

http://alwyncosgrove.blogspot.com/20...1_archive.html scroll down to " Resistance Training vs Aerobic Training for Fat Loss". Then a follow up right at the top of the same page (Resistance training for fat loss).

The gist being that resistance training uses more calories than once thought.

Interesting stuff.
__________________
"Adapt and overcome."

"Everything you need is inside you."
tonester is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 10-01-2009, 08:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Who Blew Poo?
 
gobbla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,054
Default

I'm not certain that the research that he's quoting is backing up what he says.

Doing one circuit of (doesn't say how many reps) x 8 exercises will burn a minimum of 25 calories. Then it talks about mice. You bust out 4 sets, you're at 100 calories and feel like you're about to die.

On the other end it's saying that everything's the same but the total calories (all parameters the same) equal almost 800.

That's a pretty big difference seems to indicate that something's jacked up in the measurement system.

The wording in the study runs with the minimum, which would pretty much concede to normal guidelines.

Looking at another epoc study by the same author you see that total energy expenditure for steady state (3.5min) is virtually identical to 45sec of sprinting (rest time wasn't noted). The SS was at 50% of VO2 max vs 180% of the sprints.

This second study strongly hints that you could go for much longer at the SS and the intensity would allow for more frequent application. You're not getting as much bang per time, but over the course of the week you could almost certainly get a greater calorie expenditure assuming that you're willing to put in the time to get it.
gobbla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 11:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
Eat, Sleep, Lift Big
 
Fulmen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerManDL View Post
You seem to be flip-flopping between "getting stronger" and "power training".

Normally I wouldn't care but this is something of a pet-peeve for me. Power training is a very specific method of training with a very specific goal. It has nothing (OK, little) to do with getting stronger, but the two are conflated by just about every damn body.

Power training is working to increase either 1) the rate of doing work (for endurance sports) or 2) force with respect to velocity (in acyclic sports, like Olympic weightlifting or throwing)

Too many people make it colloquial and just have "power" equal "strength", but they are separate terms with separate meanings.
Yea, I was wondering WTF "power training" even was.
__________________
The JP Fitness Blodybuilder
Fulmen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 03:11 AM   #8 (permalink)
will fight you
 
PowerManDL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bizarro World, down near Rand McNally
Posts: 2,724
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbla View Post
I'm not certain that the research that he's quoting is backing up what he says.

Doing one circuit of (doesn't say how many reps) x 8 exercises will burn a minimum of 25 calories. Then it talks about mice. You bust out 4 sets, you're at 100 calories and feel like you're about to die.

On the other end it's saying that everything's the same but the total calories (all parameters the same) equal almost 800.

That's a pretty big difference seems to indicate that something's jacked up in the measurement system.

The wording in the study runs with the minimum, which would pretty much concede to normal guidelines.

Looking at another epoc study by the same author you see that total energy expenditure for steady state (3.5min) is virtually identical to 45sec of sprinting (rest time wasn't noted). The SS was at 50% of VO2 max vs 180% of the sprints.

This second study strongly hints that you could go for much longer at the SS and the intensity would allow for more frequent application. You're not getting as much bang per time, but over the course of the week you could almost certainly get a greater calorie expenditure assuming that you're willing to put in the time to get it.
A good rule of thumb is that any time something claims more calorie burn than DNP, it's probably full of shit.
__________________

Articles | Blog | Pirate my book.
"Yeah, but you did your post grad thesis on trolling, so you don't count."
-JP, endorsing how awesome I am
PowerManDL is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 PM.

Features ...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger