JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training > Fitness > Training Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Training Discussion Ask workout questions or share your knowledge.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2004, 12:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
Jean-Paul
I think, therefore I post
 
Jean-Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 14,398
Exclamation

Lou had a link to this article in his blog, which - I will agree - is a bit of a draconian solution. Curious about other opinions on this piece.
--------------------------------------------------------

Time for steroid testing in high school
If kids can't get caught, the problem will only get worse




Commentary
By Mike Celizic
NBCSports.com contributor
Updated: 2:39 p.m. ET April 24, 2004The question isn’t why kids take steroids. Rather, it is why the great majority of teens aspiring to be professional athletes don’t take steroids, and why we do virtually nothing to attempt to stop the minority who do.

Statistics vary but the latest national survey of steroid use among teens reports that 3.5 percent of high school seniors admitted to using steroids at least once. That doesn’t sound like a lot. But it’s a 67 percent increase over the 1991 and a 17 percent increase over figures cited by the National Institute on Drug Abuse in 1999.

So, while the numbers look small, they’re rising rapidly, and that’s an indictment of an education system that would rather invent reasons why it can’t -– or won’t -- do anything about it than find ways to stop it.

The Olympics tests for steroids and every other performance-enhancing drug. Pro sports leagues test. Colleges test. High schools, with just a few exceptions, don’t test. And if you don’t test for steroids, you are telling kids to go ahead and use them, because they won’t get caught.

If you don’t test for steroids, you are telling kids to go ahead and use them, because they won’t get caught.

You can lecture kids all you want about the dangers of steroids, about the incredible shrinking testicles and acne blooms and possible liver damage down the road. There are always going to be some, just as there are some athletes at every stage of competition, who are willing to take the risks if they can see a clear reward.

Major League Baseball is experiencing a public relations nightmare because, until last year, it didn’t test for any drugs, including steroids. Because it didn’t test, players –- and no one knows how many –- used those drugs as well as human growth hormone to get bigger and stronger. Records fell. Kids watched. And they imitated their heroes.

A recent Associated Press story on the subject of kids and steroids quoted various high-school officials giving what, for many, is the standard excuse: They can’t afford the $50 it costs for each steroid test. For other school systems, including those in New York and New Jersey, civil rights are cited by the few administrators who will even talk on the record about the subject.

But in the same AP report, schools that don’t test for steroids do test athletes for other drugs such as marijuana and cocaine. The tests for so-called recreational drugs are relatively inexpensive, but if you’re going to test for drugs that don’t enhance performance, you’re just playing to the bleachers: “Look, we’re testing the athletes for drugs.” But you’re not testing them for the drugs that matter in this regard, the ones that equate with cheating.

Until we do test, the numbers of kids taking the drugs will continue to rise, because the upside of cheating –- especially when you can’t get caught -– is incredible.

Hero status and a Hummer
We celebrate people who are big and strong and fast and skillful, idolize them, buy the products they endorse, dress like them, talk like them, worship the socks they sweat in.

It isn’t something we invented, another product of modern decadence. The Greeks idolized athletes and warrior-heroes and were obsessed with physical appearance. Win at the ancient Olympic Games for your city-state and you were set for life, as big a star in that world as athletes are today.

We devote magazines and large sections of our newspapers and television networks and clear-channel radio stations to recording their every move and dissecting their games, talents and lives.

And we pay them millions upon millions of dollars so that they live like feudal lords, with the exception that they owe allegiance to no one.

Who wouldn’t want a piece of that? What kid with a competitive itch and above-average coordination wouldn’t want to get all of that, especially if it involves playing a game in public and being allowed -– encouraged even –- to spit and scratch without losing social style points.

If you ever played sports as a kid and had any degree of talent you stood in the driveway shooting free throws. You were playing in the Final Four, the national championship game, for State U., 50,000 people screaming in the stands, millions watching on television, a dozen or more of the most beautiful women on campus cheering for you on the sidelines.

You were down a point with no time left. Sink both foul shots and your team wins, you’re a hero, you get drafted in the NBA lottery, you buy a Hummer and a Porsche and an Escalade and live in a house so big you need a golf cart to get around in it.

Or you spend every quarter you can cadge at the batting cages, and now it’s the bottom of the ninth in the World Series. You’re playing for the Yankees and you’re down three, two outs, bases loaded, the game’s greatest relief pitcher on the mound. You take him deep and two weeks later sign a $40-million contract to endorse hamburgers and show up in People magazine with a super model on each arm.

On the edge between big-league and also-ran
As we grow, most of us realize we don’t have the talent to reach that dream. But the few who do lock onto it and devote themselves to reaching secular Nirvana. The very few who have surpassing talent have their paths clear. But a lot of kids are on the edge between big-league and also-ran.

Forty years ago, the kids who weren’t quite big enough lifted weights to get bigger. Then diet became a big issue and advanced types of training. Eventually, these magic drugs that make your muscles grow like kudzu became popular.

Arnold Schwarzenegger launched a career that has taken him to the California Governor’s mansion on steroids. Vince McMahon’s pro wrestling empire got where it is via the same vehicle. NFL locker rooms 20 years ago looked like Mr. Universe conventions. Muscles were definitely in.

It’s a different world in the NFL today. You don’t see the 300-pound guys with 3 percent body fat anymore. You get caught doing steroids, it’s a four-game suspension for the first offense. It’s not worth it.

But it is worth it in high school, because you can’t get caught. The rewards of being one of the few who makes the big time are enormous. When you’re talking to kids who feel immortal, dire warnings of what can happen down the line don’t cut it.

We have to find the national will to test for performance-enhancing drugs at the level at which the greatest numbers compete, at the level at which kids are being told every day that if they get bigger and stronger, they can make it to the next step on the climb to superstardom.

And it can’t be left to the individual school systems. When they say they don’t have the money, they’re not just avoiding the issue; they’re being honest. State governments and the federal government, which are bigger on talking about education than actually paying for it, have to find the money to do this.

It’s not really an option, something we can do or not do. We want our competition to be clean. That means testing kids in high school. Now.

More Sports Coverage
News and commentary from NBC Sports


© 2004 NBC Sports.com
__________________
Jean-Paul Francoeur
www.jpfitness.com

http://forums.jpfitness.com
"Twenty years from now, you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbour. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
-Mark Twain

Jean-Paul is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2004, 09:28 AM   #2 (permalink)
joshman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 164
Post

It shouldn't be up to the highschool? This sounds a little too "the government should fix the problem". And the only thing the government can ever do consistently is f**k up things.

What about coaches? On my high school team, the coach seemed pretty in the loop about everything that went on even in the social lives of the players. The guys who were juicing were pretty obvious, and the only thing the coaching staff ever did was recruit them for the powerlifting team.

Kids are kids because they need guidance, agreed. But the guidance should be provided by the coaches, not some big brother authority.
joshman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-07-2004, 11:19 AM   #3 (permalink)
Kaiser
Power to the pedals!
 
Kaiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: City of Broad Shoulders
Posts: 9,227
Post

I didn't even know Lou had a weblog. Male Pattern Fitness. Great name.

After reading the article, I have to ask, 'Where are the parents?" Are they condoning the abuse, or are they ignorant of it? In my mind, it always ultimately comes down to the parents' involvement in their kids lives.
__________________
Yep, this is my signature:

Kaiser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 02:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Lou Schuler
Rock Star of Fitness
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 3,432
Post

Since the blog is on hiatus while I build its new home, I thought I'd reply here:

I ripped on this article in my blog, but since I wrote it, I got a series of emails from a guy who identified himself as a teacher in a large, sports-oriented high school in the South.

He told me that the steroid problem is bigger than statistics show, not because all that many kids are using them, but because so many kids want to. He said the only barrier is cost--most of the kids who want to use steroids can't afford them.

FWIW, he said there's very little resistance to them beyond cost.

I thought that was interesting.
__________________
Lou Schuler, C.S.C.S.

http://www.louschuler.com/
Lou Schuler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 02:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Q.
Just Plain SENIOR
 
Q.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SPURSville, Texas
Posts: 4,331
Post

FROM LOU'S BLOG:

"Actually, one of my instant regrets about The Testosterone Advantage Plan is that we didn't emphasize fiber, as we should have."


My "dried plums" sit on my desk everyday and are available for snacks all the time, home and work.

My Admin Asst was forcing down her Metamucil the other day and I said, "try one of these." She would never have eaten them on her own but now she thanks me for introducing her to them. In fact, she says "I thank you every morning." TMI!!!
__________________
YES WE CAN
Q. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 02:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
Kaiser
Power to the pedals!
 
Kaiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: City of Broad Shoulders
Posts: 9,227
Post

I think you meant TMIO: turn my insides out.



Prunes are yummy. Tell her to try Kashi Go Lean cereal. That stuff is big-time colon blow.
__________________
Yep, this is my signature:

Kaiser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 06:05 PM   #7 (permalink)
Brian Grasso
Youth Fitness Expert
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 206
Post

Hey All,

"He told me that the steroid problem is bigger than statistics show, not because all that many kids are using them, but because so many kids want to."

I couldn't agree with this more. As most of you know, this is a VERY passionate topic for me. I have done interviews with newspapers and radio stations all over the country as well as TV appearances for CLTV & ABC (I'm doing NBC next week). In addition to all of this, I have given two seminars on this topic and am arranging a National Tour speaking out against steroid abuse in youth athletics.

The numbers are very scary -

* 1 in 30 male teenagers are on steroids.

* 1 in 100 PRE-teens are on steroids.

* 40% of high school seniors are taking some kind of performance enhancing drug.

* A recent study of 873 high school football players in Indiana (from 27 different schools), showed that 6% of them were currently taking steroids (52 kids), and that 15% of them started taking BEFORE THE AGE OF 10.

* As steroid use in young athletes continues to increase, knowledge of side effects has decreased (kids don't know the dangers).

The fact remains however, that a good number of kids taking drugs do not admit to doing so in these surveys (most of the studies I've quoted cited this as an issue of accuracy).

One of the studies I consulted showed that although some high school districts are considering testing their athletes (to a price tag of $40,000 PER SEASON), most of the research points to grassroots education as the only realistic and attainable means of combating this problem. Additionally, Senator Jackie Speair in California is on a crusade to make ALL youth sporting coaches take MANDATORY courses on performance enhancing drug use and abuse.

Food for thought -

* 1 in 100 PRE-teens are on steroids -- who is paying for a ten year olds steroid habit?

* 'Testing' measures are largely unsuccessful within pro and Olympic sports. Why spend money on testing kids? -- educate on all aspects of performance enhancing drugs when kids are young. The Sports Journal (United States Sports Academy) cites this as the only logical solution.

Lots more to say, but I'll leave it there.

- Brian
__________________
Brian J. Grasso
Youth Development Specialist
www.DevelopingAthletics.com
www.IYCA.org

Programming is the Science...
But Coaching is the Art.
Brian Grasso is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 06:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
10iscoach
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: texas
Posts: 98
Post

training and performance in sports has become medicalized. training and performance are seen as increasingly in medical and "sport science" terms. many people now regard special medical treatments reserved in the past for those who were sick or in poor health as tools for coping with the everyday challenges of training and competing in athletics, especially in power and performance sports. As this has happened, the use of biochemistry and pharmacology has become "normalized" in ahtletics and among athletes. many athletes now believe that ingesting the performance enhancing substances developed by "scientists" and those claiming to be scientists has become a normal part of being an athlete. kids nowadays, believe sports often involve an unquestioning acceptance of norms, rather than a rejecting of so called norms such as steroid abuse. I belief steroids are viewed as the norm in todays sports world. so do kids.
__________________
\"the results start when you do\"
10iscoach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 11:36 AM   #9 (permalink)
Lou Schuler
Rock Star of Fitness
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 3,432
Post

Brian, I'm sorry, my BS detector just blew a load of Kashi Go Lean all over my new desk.

One in 100 pre-teens is ON steroids, or one in 100 has used a performance-enhancing drug or supplement in the past 12 months?

40% of high school seniors USE performance-enhancing drugs, or 40% have used a performance-enhancing drug or supplement in the past 12 months?

Knowledge of side effects has decreased, or acknowledgment that there are few known dangers has increased?

I'm in no way advocating teen steroid use. I launched a new magazine (MH Muscle) specifically as an alternative to bodybuilding magazines for guys who don't want to use training drugs.

But I still want to blow chunks every time I see the real problem exaggerated in order to get more people up in arms about it.

You can fill in your own political analogy here, but let me just say I'm a big believer in analyzing and reacting to the facts without embellishing them. I'm much more worried about the thousands of kids who're smoking cigarettes at age 10 than the one kid whose dad may have given him creatine so he could make his local travel baseball team.

And I'm appalled at the conflating of drug and supplement data. There are no known dangers to taking protein and creatine supplements, at any age. We don't know the risks of prohormones, but we do know there's zero evidence that they actually work. As for steroids, the statistics show us that maybe ... what? Four or 5 out of every 100 male high school athletes has tried them by the time he graduates?

That's still too many, but I'll continue to argue that we don't help our cause by deliberately distorting the categories and statistics to make the situation seem worse than it is.
__________________
Lou Schuler, C.S.C.S.

http://www.louschuler.com/
Lou Schuler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 12:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
Kaiser
Power to the pedals!
 
Kaiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: City of Broad Shoulders
Posts: 9,227
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Lou Schuler:
Brian, I'm sorry, my BS detector just blew a load of Kashi Go Lean all over my new desk.
Lou's eating something that is soy-based? No way!

[img]smile.gif[/img]

(Yeah, I know it was just literary license. I just couldn't resist.)
__________________
Yep, this is my signature:

Kaiser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 12:14 PM   #11 (permalink)
poopy pants
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 323
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Kaiser:
Lou's eating something that is soy-based? No way!

[img]smile.gif[/img]

(Yeah, I know it was just literary license. I just couldn't resist.)
Next book: SAP - The Soy Advantage Plan
poopy pants is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 12:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
Kaiser
Power to the pedals!
 
Kaiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: City of Broad Shoulders
Posts: 9,227
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Tony Soprano:
Next book: SAP - The Soy Advantage Plan
Hmmm....gynocomastia DOES allow you to have bigger looking pecs......

[img]tongue.gif[/img]
__________________
Yep, this is my signature:

Kaiser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 12:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Lou Schuler
Rock Star of Fitness
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 3,432
Post

Hey, it's just once a day. You know, a little boost. I could quit anytime I wanted. And those rumors that I left MH so I could spend more time at home with my Kashi? Lies!
__________________
Lou Schuler, C.S.C.S.

http://www.louschuler.com/
Lou Schuler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 12:23 PM   #14 (permalink)
bryanc
MudFud
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,050
Post

I'd agree with Lou here. Those figures seem...off. I'd be interested to see the references for those. It's more than likely 1 in 100 preteens are on steroids if you include corticosteroids (in fact, 1 in 100 seems a bit low if you include corticosteroids).

As with any epidemiological study, the main issues have to do with defining your exposure, and defining your denominator population. Ambiguity with either of these can result in an incorrect estimate of prevalence or incidence.
__________________
Evidence-Based Fitness -- Critical Reviews of Fitness Research http://evidencebasedfitness.bl ogspot.com
bryanc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 12:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
Kaiser
Power to the pedals!
 
Kaiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: City of Broad Shoulders
Posts: 9,227
Post

Lou can't afford to eat soy because he already lives in a household of females! No need for anything potentially testosterone lowering (perpetuating the rumors here).

Kaiser has 2 boys, and after 16 years of marriage has already been emmasculated of any independence long ago, so he can afford the protection from breast cancer. Gotta go...my wife is calling.


[img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
Yep, this is my signature:

Kaiser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 02:28 PM   #16 (permalink)
Johnka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,939
Post

My BS detector just blew creatine, maltodextrin, and protein (whey thank you [img]smile.gif[/img] ) all over my shiny new monitor, followed with coffee after getting a kick out of Lou's retort.

In a study of 2 professors (myself and the guy in the office next to me), 100% of archaeologists take performance-enhancing drugs. I'm talking about creatine here, and the guy in the next office hasn't used creatine, but he is a cultural anthropologist.

I'm just poking fun Brian - what you say is very interesting and you probably know a hell of a lot more about the subject than I do. But those stats do seem overly sensational.

Statistics can be very misleading. I'd be interested in what you classify as steroids. Are you speaking strictly of synthetic analogs or derivatives of testosterone and nor-testosterone? What about performance-enhancing drugs - does that include creatine?

I'm very interested to hear more about these studies - how were the samples taken?

Quote:
6% of them were currently taking steroids (52 kids), and that 15% of them started taking BEFORE THE AGE OF 10.
15% of 52 is 7.8

What sort of steroids were these 7.8 kids taking?
__________________
Training Log
Johnka is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 04:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
cuvermodel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 319
Arrow

My younger brother is on a growth hormone of some sort, although I don't know exactly what it is, guess I'll ask mom later today. He takes a shot every night (he's in 8th grade). Supposedly it's for some deficiency, but I know my parents are just trying to turn him into the next Bonds
__________________
DKing: I would rather lift with naked old dudes

Mark_13: I love jeter
cuvermodel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!