JP Fitness Forums powered by fitness insite  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums > Fitness > Training Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Training Discussion Ask workout questions or share your knowledge.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2008, 10:14 AM   #1 (permalink)
Hulky-poo Dumbass
 
kfisherx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,038
Default The definitive articles on fat burning and cardio

Are there any generally accepted ideas, articles, studies or references on fat burning and cardio or is this just a subject of too much controversy for people to generally agree? I am looking around this site and the web for my and not being succesful on finding articles that do no conflict somewhat. I fear this is sort of like the whole squat debate and that I will have to go through another long series of questions to really get what I think is right amongst all the opinions.

Specifically I am looking for answer to the following?

At what point in a cardio routine does a person go from fat burning to LBM burning?

I am reasonably familar with the heart rate zone concepts and how they work as far as burning fat versus carbs but I don't get them to this detail.

I am asking this question because at the gym where I train the head trainer talks like he knows this definitively to his clients telling them that if they work out at Borg PRE scale of somewhat hard or hard (I think this translates to HR 140-160) that they are burning LBM. I don't agree with him in my gut but I cannot really point to any definitive source and am finding that many of the sources conflict with one another.
__________________
The BIGGER I get the smaller you look
kfisherx is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 10:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
dividing by zero
 
LisaS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange Cty, CA
Posts: 5,297
Default

this sounds like something right up Lyle's alley - have you asked over there for sources or opinions?
__________________
Training Log


Quote:
Water babies singing in a lily-pool delight
Blue powder monkeys praying in the dead of night
LisaS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 10:58 AM   #3 (permalink)
needs more estrogen
 
Alan Aragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 784
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kfisherx View Post
Are there any generally accepted ideas, articles, studies or references on fat burning and cardio or is this just a subject of too much controversy for people to generally agree? I am looking around this site and the web for my and not being succesful on finding articles that do no conflict somewhat. I fear this is sort of like the whole squat debate and that I will have to go through another long series of questions to really get what I think is right amongst all the opinions.
Hi Karla,

IMO, here are the best articles you're gonna get on this subject (pardon me for including my own):

Myths Under the Microscope Part 1: The Low Intensity Fat Burning Zone - AlanAragon.com - Fitness Based on Science & Experience
Myths Under the Microscope Part 2: False Hopes for Fasted Cardio - AlanAragon.com - Fitness Based on Science & Experience
Myths Under the Microscope Part 3: Discussion & Afterthoughts - AlanAragon.com - Fitness Based on Science & Experience

Steady State vs. Interval Training: Summing Up Part 1 | BodyRecomposition - The Home of Lyle McDonald
Steady State vs. Interval Training: Summing Up Part 2 | BodyRecomposition - The Home of Lyle McDonald
Steady State vs. Interval Training: A Conclusion | BodyRecomposition - The Home of Lyle McDonald

Quote:
Specifically I am looking for answer to the following?

At what point in a cardio routine does a person go from fat burning to LBM burning?
Regarding your bolded question, it really all depends on the nature of the fed status of the trainee, but more importantly, the diet as a whole. The most useful answer I can give you is that you generally don't have to worry about muscle protein loss resulting from intense cardio unless your overall protein and calorie intake is insufficient. If you train fasted, or if there are no exogenous substrates (ingested fuels such as protein or protein & carbs) being absorbed into circulation during training, a loss of muscle protein can occur to varying degrees depending on the intensity and/or duration of the training bout. But keep in mind that this can be a temporary condition reversible by feeding. Overall, I'll caution you against overthinking this and arguing with ignorant folks...

The rest of the stuff I'll mention really isn't that important but might give you more food for thought. Muscle protein loss is measurable by various indexes including elevations creatine kinase levels and/or 3-methyhistidine levels. Muscle protein loss can more directly be measured by arterioveinous amino acid balance, and even more directly through needle biopsy. Another thing to throw in here is that when you speak of LBM loss, there is nonessential (water, glycogen, etc) & essential LBM (the protein components). The net loss of essential LBM is a bit more of a long-term process as a result of insufficient dietary factors, whereas nonessential LBM loss is either a neutral or bad thing depending on the goal of the trainee. Unfortunately, none of this stuff has been systematically investigated to the degree that would satisfy your question, Karla.
Alan Aragon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 11:03 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master of my domain
 
Chris Correia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 4,379
Default

So, bottom line?

If one is consuming sufficient, albeit deficit level, nutrients on a frequent basis, don't worry about it?
__________________
There are no shortcuts.

www.duluthmartialarts.com

Facebook: Chris Correia
Twitter: chrisjcorreia
Chris Correia is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 11:05 AM   #5 (permalink)
needs more estrogen
 
Alan Aragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 784
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Correia View Post
So, bottom line?

If one is consuming sufficient, albeit deficit level, nutrients on a frequent basis, don't worry about it?
Yes. That would be the bottom.

PS - you coming to JP 2009, bro?
Alan Aragon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-28-2008, 11:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
dividing by zero
 
LisaS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange Cty, CA
Posts: 5,297
Default

seems like there are several questions:
1) at what point (if ever) is LBM (essential) burned for energy during a workout and is there a non-invasive way to know if LBM is converting to glucose compared to native glucose being burned
2) assuming #1 occurs, at what point is this detrimental to overall LBM as compared to a temporary loss replaced at the next meal
3) at what point does long term endurance training result in the dropping of weight and loss of LBM that is associated with elite athletes in endurance sports

ETA: or what Alan said
__________________
Training Log


Quote:
Water babies singing in a lily-pool delight
Blue powder monkeys praying in the dead of night
LisaS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 11:15 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master of my domain
 
Chris Correia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 4,379
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Aragon View Post
Yes. That would be the bottom.

PS - you coming to JP 2009, bro?
Wow, lots of people are asking! I've got a following!

I hope so. I've got to go to Korea in the fall, so . . .$$$$$. But I can drive to KC, and maybe even with another MN person or two.

Sigh . . . if I go, then I'll have to actually lose some pounds, then pump back up . . . sigh. Right on topic here.

Aw, screw it; take me as the old, little chubby guy I am, or not. I'm more into feeling good than looking good at this point in my life and vocation.
__________________
There are no shortcuts.

www.duluthmartialarts.com

Facebook: Chris Correia
Twitter: chrisjcorreia
Chris Correia is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 12:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Chris Mason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 227
Default

Unless you are performing extreme aerobic work you will not burn muscle per se. The problem with aerobic work relative to size and strength, and this is irrespective of caloric intake, is that it and resistance training essentially elicit the opposite adaptation by the skeletal musculature. So, to optimize results from either form of training requires the exclusion of the other. You can do both and achieve good results, so it all comes down to Jack of all trades, master of none and what you want from your training.
__________________
www.atlargenutrition.com
Chris Mason is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 01:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
Queen of the Princesses!
 
UConnJulie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,025
Default

Alan, you talk about it being a somewhat transient thing that can be overcome by eating ... is that also true that if you are resistance training, the small effects of muscle loss that might occur with cardio are reversed with adequate resistance work? (For someone not looking to gain, in other words, just looking to avoid losing LBM while dieting.)
__________________
Life's a Journey ... Enjoy the Ride!
UConnJulie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 02:20 PM   #10 (permalink)
Fat Loss Troubleshooter
 
Leigh P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,823
Default

There is a lot to consider in a situation like this.

First off, what most people don't realize is the LBM (lean body mass) doesn't just mean muscle. Loss of LBM and Atrophy are two different things. Yes, connected, but two different things. When studies and people measure body fat decreases and try to calculate percentage of muscle lost they fail to often take into account glycogen and water. Both are LBM.

Being someone who has had to purposely decrease muscle mass in female trainee (ie those who it should be easy as possible) I can assure you that it isn't a walk in the park. The easiest way to do it is by NOT training. You are going to see atropy from immobolization at a much faster rate than in training, even when crossing over into high stress oxidative states.

If you take a person of average training, average diet, suitable resting and feeding breaks, these questions really aren't that relevant beyond that of just fun discussion. Where it changes is when people start to do stupid shit and to some degree endurance athletes. It doesn't have to be, but they usually do a lot of stupid shit nutrition wise, hince where the problem comes in.

People don't kill muscle from cardio, they kill muscle from cardio and not eating enough.

Question: When do we see the worst atrophy situations occur?

-Overtraining
-Undereating
-Immoblization

The small and minor erasing of muscle in a deficit can easily be made up for in the break period with correctly timed training to support it.

The only people who end up "fat skinny" from training are those who never trained in the first place and expect the fat to melt off into buff. It doesn't matter how good the training program is, there had to be a base there in the first place. If not then after you free the fat, move in to a slow bulking situation, move into a hypertrophy stage, and then bounce around as need for the long term to increase muscle, decrease fat as needed. Newbie effect will only get most people so far.

End note: Loss of LBM with training has become far to "Bro-speak" and isn't nearly a worry as most make it to be.
Leigh P. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 04:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
AllGenetix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 95
Default

Alan's link to his articles as well as Lyle's should provide more than enough material for anyone trying to understand the effects of cardio wrt diet/training/nutrition. also, Leigh's post....spot on...nice!
__________________
My 2007-2008 Log
AllGenetix is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 05:13 PM   #12 (permalink)
Lift-Study-Burn
 
Jamesbd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Default

Great resources and fantastic post Leigh. I am going to bookmark this to share with people who are bro challenged.
__________________
CSCS
"Problems are to the mind what exercise is to the muscles, they toughen and make strong"
Jamesbd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 05:29 PM   #13 (permalink)
Queen of the Princesses!
 
UConnJulie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leigh P. View Post
There is a lot to consider in a situation like this.

First off, what most people don't realize is the LBM (lean body mass) doesn't just mean muscle. Loss of LBM and Atrophy are two different things. Yes, connected, but two different things. When studies and people measure body fat decreases and try to calculate percentage of muscle lost they fail to often take into account glycogen and water. Both are LBM.

Being someone who has had to purposely decrease muscle mass in female trainee (ie those who it should be easy as possible) I can assure you that it isn't a walk in the park. The easiest way to do it is by NOT training. You are going to see atropy from immobolization at a much faster rate than in training, even when crossing over into high stress oxidative states.

If you take a person of average training, average diet, suitable resting and feeding breaks, these questions really aren't that relevant beyond that of just fun discussion. Where it changes is when people start to do stupid shit and to some degree endurance athletes. It doesn't have to be, but they usually do a lot of stupid shit nutrition wise, hince where the problem comes in.

People don't kill muscle from cardio, they kill muscle from cardio and not eating enough.

Question: When do we see the worst atrophy situations occur?

-Overtraining
-Undereating
-Immoblization

The small and minor erasing of muscle in a deficit can easily be made up for in the break period with correctly timed training to support it.

The only people who end up "fat skinny" from training are those who never trained in the first place and expect the fat to melt off into buff. It doesn't matter how good the training program is, there had to be a base there in the first place. If not then after you free the fat, move in to a slow bulking situation, move into a hypertrophy stage, and then bounce around as need for the long term to increase muscle, decrease fat as needed. Newbie effect will only get most people so far.

End note: Loss of LBM with training has become far to "Bro-speak" and isn't nearly a worry as most make it to be.
As usual, you state things in such a way that all can "get it" ... you remain teh awsumness!!
__________________
Life's a Journey ... Enjoy the Ride!
UConnJulie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 08:33 PM   #14 (permalink)
Hulky-poo Dumbass
 
kfisherx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Aragon View Post
Hi Karla,

IMO, here are the best articles you're gonna get on this subject (pardon me for including my own)...

Overall, I'll caution you against overthinking this and arguing with ignorant folks...
Dang now I feel really stoopid! I looked for valid research and failed to check with Mr. Science-based Research.

I have read your articles before so I knew that my gut was telling me he was wrong. I just could not remember where that source was coming from and did not think to look at your site or Lyle's for that matter either. Dooop. There is so much mis-information out there that I got caught up in it is my only excuse.

LOL on the warning! I won't get into arguments and will try to not over think this but want to be careful that I don't follow the ignorant off the cliff at the very least... I think I can figure out how to move forward with this now... Sigh, so much to learn here.

Thanks for popping in here and helping out!
__________________
The BIGGER I get the smaller you look
kfisherx is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 08:43 PM   #15 (permalink)
Hulky-poo Dumbass
 
kfisherx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AllGenetix View Post
Alan's link to his articles as well as Lyle's should provide more than enough material for anyone trying to understand the effects of cardio wrt diet/training/nutrition. also, Leigh's post....spot on...nice!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesbd View Post
Great resources and fantastic post Leigh. I am going to bookmark this to share with people who are bro challenged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UConnJulie View Post
As usual, you state things in such a way that all can "get it" ... you remain teh awsumness!!
X3. Leigh, so much appreciation for your post too. I love it when you weigh in on these matters. You break shit down in the simplest and most straight forward way and in this case confirmed what Alan is saying too. You guys are the best! Looking forward to watching both of you in action in May. I feel like, with you guys as a support team, I might actually emerge as a decent fitness pro despite the bodybuilding waters I swim in here in Portland.

-Karla (bro-challenged but open...)
__________________
The BIGGER I get the smaller you look
kfisherx is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 08:53 PM   #16 (permalink)
needs more estrogen
 
Alan Aragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 784
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UConnJulie View Post
Alan, you talk about it being a somewhat transient thing that can be overcome by eating ... is that also true that if you are resistance training, the small effects of muscle loss that might occur with cardio are reversed with adequate resistance work? (For someone not looking to gain, in other words, just looking to avoid losing LBM while dieting.)
Yes, but only if sufficient protein consumed, and the caloric deficit isn't too severe or prolonged without breaks or refeeds. Strength training will mitigate muscle loss, but it's not a 100% safeguard in the absence of enough raw material to build with.
Alan Aragon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Features ...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger