| Training Discussion Ask workout questions or share your knowledge. |
 |
|
12-02-2007, 10:39 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Back to HELL I go
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Embracing the Suck
Posts: 2,878
|
The Women's Deadlift Chart
The principles will be the same for the Women's DL Chart as the Men's.
The rankings will be listed twice - once by 1 RM weight and once by Coefficent (weight pulled/BW).
I'll go through the posts the first weekend of every month and put together a ranking - the first ranking will be posted next Sunday.
|
|
|
12-02-2007, 11:28 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 3,393
|
Cool idea 
My last 1RM was at the Spider Games, Nov 18, CDL 220lbs./ BW 125lbs
__________________
My blog on fitness, nutrition and the beauty of it all
"Before I learned the art, a punch was just a punch, and a kick, just a kick.
After I learned the art, a punch was no longer a punch, a kick, no longer a kick.
Now that I understand the art, a punch is just a punch and a kick is just a kick."
Bruce Lee
|
|
|
12-02-2007, 11:51 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Back to HELL I go
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Embracing the Suck
Posts: 2,878
|
You can thank Leah for the idea. SHe mentioned in in my Journal and JP said go for it
CDL - 155 lbs at 252 lbs.
|
|
|
12-02-2007, 05:42 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Prime Motivator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stewartstown, PA
Posts: 9,259
|
Go for it, ladies.
__________________
In Fitness & Friendship,
MAHLER
______________________________ __________________________
There is no light at the end of the tunnel. You carry the light with you.
|
|
|
12-02-2007, 07:32 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Dirty hippie & den cougar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scaryville, CA
Posts: 2,563
|
CDL 225 @ 140
__________________
Here's my badass new and improved log
There are no facts, only interpretations.
--Friedrich Nietzsche
Procrastination is...the thief of time.
--Dr Martin Luther King, Jr
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 03:22 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NLs
Posts: 1,315
|
Finally a womens-only chart
I'll take the freedom to repost the numbers of a friend who's not visiting JP Forums much anymore:
2.12 - Miss_Deadlift (335/158)
And then mine again
Last 1RM-max for DL was 105kg, pulled on Oct 19. Same weight as I'd pulled on January 16 this same year, but with different BW.
January: 64.4kg = coefficient of 1.63
October: 62.2 kg = coefficient of 1.69
However, I'm hoping to surpass that 105 kg once again next January. Dang, make that I *will* surpass that weight.. actually my hope is set on 120kg and get close to 2xBW one day!
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 07:30 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Short Man Magnet
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 711
|
Paula-
Thanks for getting this together. It is awesome! I was kind of making excuses to myself Friday about why I didn't feel like going to do my workout, but when I read that you were doing a women's chart I wanted to go and kick ass!
So from Friday night, my best CDL is
190 @ 164 lbs (1.16)
Leah
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 10:44 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Back to HELL I go
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Embracing the Suck
Posts: 2,878
|
Great Job Leah!
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 12:56 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 491
|
Ok, dumb question, and I am sure there is an equation somewhere, but...if I can DL 100lbs x 10, what weight could I possible lift for 1RM?
Deb
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 01:33 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Lead Cat Herder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange Cty, CA
Posts: 2,566
|
There are tables for getting a ballpark guess. In most cases, 10RM is about 75% of your 1RM I think. Reversing the math, 100 lb for 10RM would be about 133 lb for 1 RM (100 / 0.75). Of course, individual factors and composition will come into play as well.
This page has an interactive calculator and some of the formulae to use.
However, there are differences based on the exercise itself. Here is another chart to show a different conversion factor for squat, bench press & deadlift.
| Repetitions | Squat | Benchpress | Deadlift |
|---|
| 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 2 | 1.0475 | 1.035 | 1.065 | | 3 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 1.13 | | 4 | 1.1575 | 1.115 | 1.147 | | 5 | 1.2 | 1.15 | 1.164 | | 6 | 1.242 | 1.18 | 1.181 | | 7 | 1.284 | 1.22 | 1.198 | | 8 | 1.326 | 1.255 | 1.232 | | 9 | 1.368 | 1.29 | 1.232 | | 10 | 1.41 | 1.325 | 1.24 |
__________________
my training log
"Have fun and be determined to finish"-- Jack "UpNorth", 9.
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 01:47 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 491
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LisaS
There are tables for getting a ballpark guess. In most cases, 10RM is about 75% of your 1RM I think. Reversing the math, 100 lb for 10RM would be about 133 lb for 1 RM (100 / 0.75). Of course, individual factors and composition will come into play as well.
This page has an interactive calculator and some of the formulae to use.
However, there are differences based on the exercise itself. Here is another chart to show a different conversion factor for squat, bench press & deadlift.
| Repetitions | Squat | Benchpress | Deadlift |
|---|
| 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 2 | 1.0475 | 1.035 | 1.065 | | 3 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 1.13 | | 4 | 1.1575 | 1.115 | 1.147 | | 5 | 1.2 | 1.15 | 1.164 | | 6 | 1.242 | 1.18 | 1.181 | | 7 | 1.284 | 1.22 | 1.198 | | 8 | 1.326 | 1.255 | 1.232 | | 9 | 1.368 | 1.29 | 1.232 | | 10 | 1.41 | 1.325 | 1.24 |
|
Thanks, that gives me an idea anyway. I would like to try and see what I can do.
Will post when I try!
Deb
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 02:16 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Training Log Designer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: City of Dis
Posts: 1,633
|
This totally sucks. I've slacked off so much now that my weight is over my deadlift.
Sigh.
Plus, I think it's been at least a month or more, maybe 2 since I've pulled.
I doubt I could pull much over 100 right now... dammit.
I suck.
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 02:34 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NLs
Posts: 1,315
|
Mind you, these numbrers are often way off. There's been written a few articles saying that if you can do >8 reps at 80% of a real 1RM you're more into endurance and when you're hitting <8 reps at 80% of the 1RM you're more a power athlete.
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 02:41 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Lead Cat Herder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange Cty, CA
Posts: 2,566
|
the only relevant numbers of course are the actuals. What you use for 3x10 sets is not your 10RM, but it is probably what comes to mind when someone mentions 10 reps. I think the charts and formulas are useful for lifts where you feel unsafe going for a true 1RM but OK trying for a 3RM (e.g. unspotted bench perhaps). But only in the context to use that number (derived 1RM) to calc starting values for other lifts/rep schemes anyway. Sometimes I take a weight that I know is a max somewhere between 2-10 reps for a given movement and then take it to max reps. Let us say I get 4. then I use the charts for 4RM to get approximate 1RM, 8RM, 10RM etc. to use in guessing starting weights for 3x10 or 5x5 or other rep/set schemes.
I hadn't heard the 8RM used for estimating fiber distribution (FT vs ST), but have heard actual 3RM compared to actual 1RM to do the same sort of thing.
__________________
my training log
"Have fun and be determined to finish"-- Jack "UpNorth", 9.
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 02:47 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Last in Line
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bizarro World, down near Rand McNally
Posts: 1,140
|
The deadlift responds less and less to the rep calculators as the weights go up. Squatting and pressing don't seem to be so bad.
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 03:04 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 564
|
I know most of the guys are thinking it so I will just come out and say it. I didn't think they made the little pink dumbbells big enough to DL, or are you talking about DB Deads?
jk ladies
Seriously, good work and I am interested to see what numbers you can put up.
__________________
Beginning is Easy - Continuing is Hard
猿も木から落ちる
Even monkeys fall from trees
- Japanese Proverb
My Training Log
|
|
|
12-05-2007, 07:37 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Dirty hippie & den cougar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scaryville, CA
Posts: 2,563
|
CDL 227 @142 (+2)
I use lavendar plates, sign. They're de rigeur. 
__________________
Here's my badass new and improved log
There are no facts, only interpretations.
--Friedrich Nietzsche
Procrastination is...the thief of time.
--Dr Martin Luther King, Jr
|
|
|
12-05-2007, 08:02 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 491
|
It was my first attempt ever, so nothing huge. But, I felt I could go higher, just no time as I was just starting my FLII workout. I first did 1 rep at 125 to test the waters so to speak.
Then:
CDL @145 x1 at 135.
I can go higher I think. Next time.
Deb
|
|
| |