JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training > Fitness > Training Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Training Discussion Ask workout questions or share your knowledge.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2005, 02:50 AM   #1 (permalink)
chi sao
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: detroit
Posts: 69
Post

Allright... I was doing some research and I found this article:

http://umanitoba.fitdv.com/new/artic...html?artid=588

Near the end of the article, he says "I measure how much people can bench press versus how much can they bent-over row. Always, when I’m looking at ratios they need to be at least within 85 per cent of each one, so if somebody bench presses 100 pounds they need to be able to bent-over row at least 85 pounds to have a decent ratio."

My max bench press is nearly 200 pounds... so this means I would need to at least do 150+ pound bent-over row to help with my (huge) imbalance situation. I'm sure he's talking about total volume though, meaning if your going to (using a popular program) do 10x3 (100lbs) bench press's with the volume equalling 3000 pounds total on the bench, you should either make the bench volume less to get near your bent-over ratio, or increase the amount of reps you do with the bent over's to get near (or more would probably be beneficial?) the volume of your bench press. The author of that article mentions you should do 3 times more work if you're not even near the 85% ratio.

Which brings me to my next question, is there a source (website) that provides things like this for all your muscle groups? For example, if you can curl so much, you should be able to (whatever exercise works the opposite muscles the curl works... deadlift?) perform another exercise to balance out the equation?


I found a good website that shows the opposing muscle groups but it doesn't show the exercises.

http://wellness.lattc.cc.ca.us/aquatics/musclebal.html

If anybody knows of a good resource, please be kind to let me know. I think I need to stay away from anymore pressing for a long time, and do the reverse movements alot more. My shoulders are sagging so much they are almost at the level of my chine and my pelvis is imbalanced and basically im one big mess :'<
__________________
The key to immortality is first living a life worth remembering. // Bruce Lee
chi sao is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 03:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
hypersonic
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: nj
Posts: 34
Post

Fust becuase they can do a certin % with there opposing muscles doesnt mean you have to. Work on muscles you need work done on.
hypersonic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-13-2005, 10:09 AM   #3 (permalink)
Newlife
Free Jumprope Distributor
 
Newlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,996
Post

WTF are you trying to say?
__________________
:p

Please help support my son...
http://www.walkamerica.org/kehaya


"We MUST overload to progress, period. All the internet gimmicks and miracle programs in the world aside....." DOS, Dec 2006
Newlife is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 10:30 AM   #4 (permalink)
Chris Correia
Master of my domain
 
Chris Correia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 3,974
Post

I don't know of other sites. But the solution is not completely volume, though volume can be part of the solution. If you could only row with 50 pounds, even if you did enough sets and reps to hit the same volume as that which are doing for your pushing/pressing, I think there is still a strength imbalance issue.

You might temporarily IMBALANCE a routine to let some movements catch up. So perhaps you should train the horiontal push just to maintain your current level of strength, but then focus on your pulling work.

Also note that some movements, like a bent over row, can be hard to do with higher weight because of the lack of support and instability given your body position. Perhaps a seated row is a better indicator.

I've heard the 85% rule a number of places, however, so it's probably not a bad ROUGH guideline for the AVERAGE trainee. However, I think this is a much more complicate topic than these simple statements. Particularly, one would want to look at anatomical/structural/postural issues with the trainee to better assess their weakness and imbalances.

With any luck, Bill Hartman will chime in.
__________________
There are no shortcuts.

www.cloquetmartialarts.com
Chris Correia is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2005, 10:32 AM   #5 (permalink)
I. Kay
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 6,474
Post

I think I get the gist of what you're saying... here's my 2 cents, in a very simplified manner:

If your bench is far better than your row (like double it) and/or your shoulders are seriously rounded, and/or you've been doing far more chest work than back work, then do exactly as you said and back off the chest, increase your rowing.

Deadlifts, neck pulls, seated/bent-over rows, chinups, scapular retractions, rotator cuff work... get all over these for a while, and cut your benching to maintenance level (like once a week, 3x5 or something).

And sorry, I don't know a site like you asked about.
I. Kay is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 10:22 PM   #6 (permalink)
Marykaa
Mountain Flower Lady
 
Marykaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Near Montréal, Québec
Posts: 3,204
Post

****************************** **********
QUOTE:
"I found a good website that shows the opposing muscle groups but it doesn't show the exercises.

http://wellness.lattc.cc.ca.us/aquatics/musclebal.html "
****************************** **********

maybe to get what you want, you could use your page in conjunction with this well known page :

ExRx.net
Marykaa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 11:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
DKing
Chick Magnet
 
DKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,521
Post

Percentages don't really work. The problem is that no two exercises are really perfect antagonists of each other. A bent row and bench press are different. The bent row involves stabalizing yourself while you pull. Not so in a bench press. You limiting factor in a bent row could be low back not midback.

A better thing to go by is simply look at total training volume and evaluate posture. If either is out of whack then you know you need to fix something.

Danny
__________________
Limitations are for people who have them.

Chicks Dig Me.
DKing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 05:10 AM   #8 (permalink)
R
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lansing
Posts: 46
Post

"Which brings me to my next question, is there a source (website) that provides things like this for all your muscle groups? For example, if you can curl so much, you should be able to (whatever exercise works the opposite muscles the curl works... deadlift?) perform another exercise to balance out the equation?"

Charles Poliquin talks about this a bit in his "Achieving Structural Balance" article at another site...

http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do?id=459454

I believe he's discussed it in either his "Question of Strength" column or his old "Ask the Guru" column on his own site (it's apy site now tho')
R is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2005, 05:27 AM   #9 (permalink)
R
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lansing
Posts: 46
Post

My thoughts on the matter are this...(I'll continue using the chest/back example):

If there is a severe imbalance (i.e. Bench is 200 and Chest Supported Row is 75). Drop ALL work for the overpowering muscle group (chest) and increase the amount of back work for 4 weeks. (If you absolutely MUST, to ease your ego, do 2X5 heavy inclines a week).

Medium imbalance (i.e. Bench is 200 and Chest Supported Row is 100), Work Back first in the week and chest last in the week. May even do back twice in the week, leaving chest at maintenace level. Increase the voume of back work significantly (approx 3-1 ratio of chest work).

Re-check strength ratios every 3-4 weeks and continue until the problem is corrected. (I believe Ian King says it will take at least half as long of time to correct the imbalance as it did to create the imbalance.

Slight imbalance (i.e. Bench is 200 and Chest Supported Row is 135), Work Back first in the week and chest last in the week. Do more of a 2-1 ratio to chest work. Focus on heavy pulling exercises esp. chest-supported rows.

Posture will be a BIG issue to look at. I just used weight ratios in the examples for easier description.

Anyway, my take on it. Hope it helped some.

R
R is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:39 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0

 

Web

forums.jpfitness.com

 

web stats