You may be over-thinking it just a bit, or perhaps taking the wrong perspective on it. At the very least, it's quite an effective method of training, another tool in the tool box for you to use for its own sake, or to turn to when whatever current protocols you're using begin to produce diminishing returns or simply grow stale and you need a change.
GG300's points are on the mark, and as for my experience with it, I had been doing an undulating set/rep scheme that incorporated 5x5 or 6x4 in it's "heavier" phases, prior to doing a 5 week block of EDT. Upon finishing the EDT block, when I resumed the undulating protocol, I found my numbers had gone up in all phases of it, including in the heavier range. I found this particularly surprising considering that EDT involves using one's 10 rep max for low rest sets of 5.
Currently I'm in the middle of an undulating set/rep scheme again, but I've found that sometimes I like to throw in an EDT day every now and then, particularly when I really don't feel like doing a work out and the best I can muster is "you don't have to do the whole thing but you have to do something." On those days, I find it easier to "just do it" when I can let go of how many sets and reps of x amount of weight I "should" be doing and just have at it for the alotted time. Invariably I end up doing the whole workout anyway, as hard or harder than I would have in the first place.
Also, I have to wonder which portion of an undulating protocol (i.e. 2-3x12-15, 3x8-10, or 5x5 or 6x4?) might an EDT day best serve as an occasional purposeful substitute, and still fall within intent of the original parameters . Any thoughts on this, EDT advocates? Charles?
|