JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums - Personal Training > The New Rules of Lifting > New Rules of Lifting for Women
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

New Rules of Lifting for Women Based on Lou's new book with Cosgrove and Forsythe

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2008, 08:04 AM   #1 (permalink)
GinaKina
Senior Member
 
GinaKina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
Default Nutrition Question

Well, I started a log on here, and from the feedback I have gotten, it seems like I'm not eating too much....which I just don't understand. I thought I followed the advice in the book exactly.

I am 5'4''
23 years old
126 lbs

I got that I should be eating 1920 calories on non-workout days, and 2170 calories on workout days. Is this horribly wrong???

If so, can someone help me out, because I've done the calculations more than once, and this is still what I come up with.
GinaKina is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 08:14 AM   #2 (permalink)
Cynthia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 172
Default

Gina - I think those calculations are a good benchmark as a place to start. You can re-evaluate after 4-6 weeks to see if you need to move in either direction.

It doesn't look like you've posted a whole day's menu in your training log (just your calorie range and one dish that you enjoy making) so I'm not sure the comments were fair that said you aren't eating enough. You haven't really given enough information in your log to make a statement either way. If you are, in fact, eating the level of calories you've committed to, I think you should be ok for now.
Cynthia is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-18-2008, 08:16 AM   #3 (permalink)
rixatrix
Senior Member
 
rixatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 535
Default

What makes you think the number is horribly wrong, specifically?

The calculation is only a calculation. You're the only one who can figure out what's right for your body and metabolism. Have you been logging your food consistently? If so, you've got good data - if you've lost weight and you don't want to, you can stand to eat more. If you're gaining weight, it could be that you're eating too much, making poor food choices, or that your metabolism was sluggish to begin with and it's adjusting. If you've stayed the same, you're spot on.

So you tell me - DO those number seem horribly wrong? And what are your goals?
__________________
"Men are taught to apologize for their weaknesses, women for their strengths." - Lois Wyse

My training log
rixatrix is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 08:23 AM   #4 (permalink)
ledove
Senior Member
 
ledove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 296
Default

The calorie calculations in the book are estimated maintenance calories, so they might be too high or they might be too low. It all depends on you. The book suggests starting at the calculated values for a few weeks to see how you're doing.

I hung out at my maintenance calories for all of Stage 1 (1900 and 2200 calories), and I maintained. I thought about dropping them a little to speed up the fat loss, but then I started Stage 2; I don't think I could finish Stage 2 on fewer calories!
__________________
Leslie
My Log
ledove is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 10:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
GinaKina
Senior Member
 
GinaKina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
Default

Thanks for the input. Rixatrix, the only thing that made me think this range was wrong was that I got two comments in my blog (mind you, there are only maybe 5 comments total, haha) that said "whoa, you need to eat more".

I wasn't planning on posting my meals for entire days. I stick to that calorie range and the 40/30/30 macro range almost religiously, and it's been working for me, but I guess I will do a sample one. I guess that since two people told me that what I was doing was way off base, I figured I should ask about it.

Oh, and I am more than halfway through Stage 1, and have MAYBE lost a pound, so I've pretty much been maintaining...which was my goal, I am not looking to lose weight.
GinaKina is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 10:22 AM   #6 (permalink)
LisaS
Lead Cat Herder
 
LisaS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange Cty, CA
Posts: 3,142
Default

If you are working out hard, gaining strength, have sufficient energy to get through your days and your workouts and maintaining your weight - it seems like you are eating at proper maintenance for your activity level.
__________________
my training log
"Have fun and be determined to finish"-- Jack "UpNorth", 9.
LisaS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 10:51 AM   #7 (permalink)
rixatrix
Senior Member
 
rixatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 535
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GinaKina View Post
Thanks for the input. Rixatrix, the only thing that made me think this range was wrong was that I got two comments in my blog (mind you, there are only maybe 5 comments total, haha) that said "whoa, you need to eat more".

I wasn't planning on posting my meals for entire days. I stick to that calorie range and the 40/30/30 macro range almost religiously, and it's been working for me, but I guess I will do a sample one. I guess that since two people told me that what I was doing was way off base, I figured I should ask about it.

Oh, and I am more than halfway through Stage 1, and have MAYBE lost a pound, so I've pretty much been maintaining...which was my goal, I am not looking to lose weight.
Just keep in mind that everyone has their own goals and biases. Some women want to put on more lean mass (which is probably inevitable on this program), and some want to lose more fat. To someone cutting, your calories might seem high. To someone actively bulking, they may seem low.

Because you've been maintaining, you could stay the same, or bump your calories up a bit and see what happens.

(Here comes the after school special...) Only YOU can know what's right for you.

Haha...it's such a cliche, but it's true.
__________________
"Men are taught to apologize for their weaknesses, women for their strengths." - Lois Wyse

My training log
rixatrix is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008, 12:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
GinaKina
Senior Member
 
GinaKina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rixatrix View Post
(Here comes the after school special...) Only YOU can know what's right for you.

Haha...it's such a cliche, but it's true.
Haha, thanks. Really, I do know that, and I passed it off when I got the first comment, but the second comment made me think I had messed something up.
__________________
My Training Log :
http://tinylink.com/?y4HcFIs6Ee
GinaKina is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:07 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0

 

Web

forums.jpfitness.com

 

web stats