JP Fitness Forums powered by fitness insite  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums > The New Rules of Lifting > The New Rules of Lifting - The Original
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The New Rules of Lifting - The Original Based on the original book by Lou Schuler with workout programs by Alwyn Cosgrove

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2008, 06:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 33
Default strength 1 query

Does anyone know the rationale in putting 15-20 rep sets in a strength phase and also why it's 4 days a week?

Secondly, with the supersets for hypertrophy, it says that bss's and step ups are put together for a deeper level of exhaustion for hypertrophy, so why is push and pull supersetted, ( for eg, shouldn't it be push supersetted with another push) to follow the theory that the bss's and step ups follow?
samirbk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 10:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
ninjamonkeyqueen
 
Aoife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: City of Dis
Posts: 6,533
Default

4 days because the workouts that would be potentially consecutive are not terribly competing.
And the really crappy reps are just to torture you.

Actually, I think it has to do with just completely blasting the muscles and tearing them apart to then cause more regrowth.

Strength is different than hypertrophy. If you're working for strength, you're not gonna be able to do as much if your supersets are push/push pull/pull. Push/pull gives you more rest for the heavier weight.

I'm assuming. I could be wrong, but that is how I remember understanding it.
Hopefully if I'm off base someone will say so.
__________________
My Etsy Fe Chick Apparel
tumble log
Aoife in Wonderland
Werkit.com - Providing the most stylish training logs you've ever seen, while retaining all the function you need. Oh yeah!
Aoife is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 01:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
feralBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 190
Default

The book says you can do Strength I, 2,3,or 4 times a week. I am just starting it, and I don't plan on doing it 4 days a week.
feralBoy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 09:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 33
Default

Hmm, maybe. I'm no expert, but I'd just like to hear the science behind putting 15 and 20 reps into a strength program.

Also yeah, I'll probably do it 3 times a week, but the "Lifter 2: The guy who considers 'skinny' an insult' program recommends Strength I & II 4 times a week.

This just goes against what I've learned about periodisation in my studies, but I don't quite have Alwyn Cosgrove's Resume lol, so I'm just a bit confused about it.
samirbk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2008, 05:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 140
Default

Quote:
Hmm, maybe. I'm no expert, but I'd just like to hear the science behind putting 15 and 20 reps into a strength program.
I would be very interested to hear the answer to that also.
3sweeties is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-02-2008, 10:43 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 140
Default

Anyone???
3sweeties is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 09:19 AM   #7 (permalink)
n00b
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 21
Default

Bueller?


Bueller?
Indy442 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 10:18 AM   #8 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Lisa~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 5,383
Default

I don't have any science to offer, but since you guys really want something, I'll suggest that IMO it's not about strength at all. The high rep portions are there to maintain the endurance and conditioning levels you built during previous phases of NROL. It seems to me to be consistent with the philosophy that the hypertrophy programs from NROL are really undulating periodization, not strictly hypertrophy.
__________________
Lisa Holladay, CSCS
Lisa~ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Features ...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger