Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa~
But it's an odd choice of substitution because it does not replace the intended purpose of the quarter squat. If your goal is strength, you've taken out the main strength builder of that day's workout and replaced it with a strength/endurance movement. It doesn't make sense if the overall goal is strength.
That surprises me actually. Since there's a very limited ROM in quarter squats, I'd think you wouldn't get into the joint angle that causes pain. But, if you say so, then I'll take your word for it. I'd want you to try walk-outs (where you unrack a really heavy load into the start position but then just stand there for a few seconds, no knee bending at all). You don't even really have to "walk" out, just set the support low enough to stand up the weight. That'd be a substitute exercise that serves the same purpose (or at least similar) as the originally prescribed quarter squats.
|
Walk outs do sound like a better idea. Full squats are much better on my knees because I go all the way down, which engages my glutes, hams, and hip adductors. Quarter squats put TONS of pressure on my knees (that's actually how I got the knee problem in the first place). Full squats are the only things
I just try to add weight to the bar each workout in order to gain strength. I do the rest of the Strength 2 as it was written. I do the rack pulls and all that stuff. The only reason I used a set of 20 rep squats is because that's what S-1 ended with. I figured that the intensity would be close to the same as that of S-1 since I'm doing 3 sets of 4, 1 set of 12, and 1 set of 20 (S-1 used the 6, 1, 6, 1, 12, 20), so I thought it would be a good substitution.