JP Fitness Forums powered by fitness insite  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums > The New Rules of Lifting > The New Rules of Lifting - The Original
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The New Rules of Lifting - The Original Based on the original book by Lou Schuler with workout programs by Alwyn Cosgrove

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2007, 08:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
I kick butt
 
Biskit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 515
Default Body Fat Test?

I've never had one done. What are the best devices? Calipers? Hand-held? I'd like to do this, my gym has the hand-held device, not sure exactly how it works, but you must drink @16 oz of water before it's done. Anyone ever had this done? How accurate? Etc??

Thanks,
Deb
Biskit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 08:39 PM   #2 (permalink)
Seņor Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 7,541
Default

Calipers. Residential consumer level bio-impedence is garbage.

You can get a 3-pt digital with tape from Accu-fitness/Accu-measure (I forget the proper name) for about $30 or so.

Amazon.com: Accu-Measure Fat Trac II Digital Skinfold Caliper: Health & Personal Care

You can get a 3-9pt manual from the same manufacturer for less.

You can also get a 7-pt digital from them for about $70-80.

Bodybuilding.com - AccuFitness Fat Track Pro - Body Fat Measurement! On sale now!

Keep in mind, anything more than 3-pt will require a second person to take the readings because one of the points is on the scapular.

But don't buy it from Amazon. Do a google search for the best price.

BTW: Cute Corgy -- it is a Corgy, right? Is it a pic of your dog?

Last edited by Cynic : 11-19-2007 at 09:05 PM.
Cynic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 11:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rural, Western Washington
Posts: 3,622
Default

Calipers: depends upon the skill of the operator

Magic electronic wands or scales: maybe

hydrostatic testing: allegedly the gold standard, but there are reasons to doubt

Cat scan: probably the new gold standard, but it is expensive

For the amateur: look at yourself in a mirror, keep track of how your favorite clothes feel.
RobLL is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 07:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
grepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynic View Post
Calipers. Residential consumer level bio-impedence is garbage.
Honest question....how come they're garbage? Is it garbage because it is not accurate, or precise?

As Rob mentioned, calipers are only as good as the operator but to add to that, they're only useful for the folks with fairly low BF anyway, aren't they?
__________________
An optimist is a person who sees a green light everywhere, while the pessimist sees only the red stoplight. The truly wise person is colourblind.

Crawling Through NROL
grepat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 08:47 AM   #5 (permalink)
You mean three DOG moon!
 
Lost Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The South Bay!
Posts: 19,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grepat View Post
Honest question....how come they're garbage? Is it garbage because it is not accurate, or precise?
I have two different Tanita scales. I went from 202 w zero abs showing to 185 with the top four showing. One went from 16% down to 15% and the other started at 15% hasn't changed yet. It changes throughout the day. In the afternoon, it will be higher (16%) and on some days it might read 14% in the morning.

The calipers can be useful for checking progress in fat loss, but I don't think they are all that accurate unless you are really lean, like you said. Still, if you are consistent, they can track progress, even if the bf% # isn't actually correct.
__________________
-
-
Lost Dog's Blog

workout log
& fitday

"The wolves spoke to me in a language all their own; it was like German, Mongol, and Bitchin' all mixed together."
Lost Dog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-20-2007, 11:53 AM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
grepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Dog View Post
I have two different Tanita scales. I went from 202 w zero abs showing to 185 with the top four showing. One went from 16% down to 15% and the other started at 15% hasn't changed yet. It changes throughout the day. In the afternoon, it will be higher (16%) and on some days it might read 14% in the morning.
I bought the Tanita scale 534 model a few days ago and it arrived today. I find it kind of humourous that I read this after I ordered it. I'll monitor it and see what happens over time - take measurements multiple times per day just to get an idea of differences/fluctuations. If anything, it'll allow me to be a 'tracking nerd' for a while....on top of calories & macros, program parameters, weight

My BF% came in at 14.8% right before I ate lunch, which I believe is about where I'm at. Although, I was thinking it would have been 14.3%. j/k

To the OP, I did the hand-held one at a local YMCA 3 years ago, but I don't know how accurate it was....I had nothing to compare it to. And the idea of paying $25 to have your BF measured every time was an incentive not to go back.
__________________
An optimist is a person who sees a green light everywhere, while the pessimist sees only the red stoplight. The truly wise person is colourblind.

Crawling Through NROL
grepat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 12:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
You mean three DOG moon!
 
Lost Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The South Bay!
Posts: 19,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grepat View Post
I bought the Tanita scale 534 model a few days ago and it arrived today. I find it kind of humourous that I read this after I ordered it. I'll monitor it and see what happens over time - take measurements multiple times per day just to get an idea of differences/fluctuations. If anything, it'll allow me to be a 'tracking nerd' for a while....on top of calories & macros, program parameters, weight

My BF% came in at 14.8% right before I ate lunch, which I believe is about where I'm at. Although, I was thinking it would have been 14.3%. j/k

To the OP, I did the hand-held one at a local YMCA 3 years ago, but I don't know how accurate it was....I had nothing to compare it to. And the idea of paying $25 to have your BF measured every time was an incentive not to go back.
BTW, I had mine tested by a fancy handheld bio model AND calipers, by the same trainer. She came up with 12% and the machine said 10%. My scale said 15%, just 60 minutes prior, and 15% when I got back home.
__________________
-
-
Lost Dog's Blog

workout log
& fitday

"The wolves spoke to me in a language all their own; it was like German, Mongol, and Bitchin' all mixed together."
Lost Dog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
dividing by zero
 
LisaS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange Cty, CA
Posts: 6,488
Default

at the point that a test would give a respectable number (other than "Lots") I'm going to get dunked.
__________________
Training Log


Quote:
Water babies singing in a lily-pool delight
Blue powder monkeys praying in the dead of night
LisaS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
I kick butt
 
Biskit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 515
Default

Thanks for all the replies, I may look into buying a Tanita scale. It seems like that is a pretty good indicator of a ballpark percentage.

Lost Dog, between the three or four different tests you had with different devices, I guess you could guestimate within 1 or 2%. So maybe I will try the Y's device, it's free for me, and then invest in a scale.



To Cynic,
Yes, that is a picture of my Corgi. He's my buddy.
Biskit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 01:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
You mean three DOG moon!
 
Lost Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The South Bay!
Posts: 19,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biskit View Post

Lost Dog, between the three or four different tests you had with different devices, I guess you could guestimate within 1 or 2%. So maybe I will try the Y's device, it's free for me, and then invest in a scale.
It could be my particular Tanita scale, too. When I first bought it (3 years ago), it said 17%. As I lost fat, it slowly worked it's way down to 13%. Those days are past. Now, it's a scale, only.

I've tried reseting it, changing the battery, deleting myself from memory to start over. Nothing works.

The trainer did the calipers first, came up with 12%. She told me that my belly skinfolds seemed high for what she thought I was (She guessed 8 or 9% before I lifted my shirt. I used to be fat...). Then, we did the bio-impedance test and came up with 10%.

Calipers are only good if the person knows how to use them. At 24 hour fitness, they are all over the map. Around the same time, they were offering free "assessments." When I took them up on it, my bf% came out to 18%.

FYI, I would not buy another Tanita scale. I usually hop off before the bf% check is done.
__________________
-
-
Lost Dog's Blog

workout log
& fitday

"The wolves spoke to me in a language all their own; it was like German, Mongol, and Bitchin' all mixed together."
Lost Dog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 03:58 PM   #11 (permalink)
I kick butt
 
Biskit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Dog View Post
FYI, I would not buy another Tanita scale. I usually hop off before the bf% check is done.
Ok, I will hold off. I really don't have that kind of extra $$ to spend on something I really am not sure about. Thanks for all the info.

I don't know if I really need to do this, just curious. I'm not really overweight or anything.

Thank you to all.
Deb
Biskit is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2007, 08:04 PM   #12 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 26
Default Consider this (from Body Tracker).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biskit View Post
I've never had one done. What are the best devices? Calipers? Hand-held? I'd like to do this, my gym has the hand-held device, not sure exactly how it works, but you must drink @16 oz of water before it's done. Anyone ever had this done? How accurate? Etc??

Thanks,
Deb
According to my Body Tracker software (basically a body fat tracker software), the body fat should be calculated using:

Jackson/Pollock 7, 4 and 3 site Fat Caliper method for Men 12% body fat and under (Women 14% body fat and under).

Parillo Fat Caliper Method for Men & Women 15% body fat and under.

Durnin/Womersley Fat Caliper Method for Men & Women 15% body fat and under.

Tape Measure Method (the Army Method, Height, Abdomen & Neck) for everyone over the previous body fat rating. Search the Internet, plenty of on-line calculator for this.

Also they say (Body Tracker Software) that none of the previous method should be used for anyone under 18 years old.

Don't forget that you can hardly do a fat caliper measurement on yourself alone, and the person performing it, should know what to do and be constant from one test to the other (so this is why the Army method is handy, and quite accurate within few percentage value, this was compared with more accurate method, like water tank).

Personally, I will stick to the Army method for a long while (being way over the 15 % fat rating).
PopeyeFAFL is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 06:35 AM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PopeyeFAFL View Post
According to my Body Tracker software (basically a body fat tracker software), the body fat should be calculated using:

Jackson/Pollock 7, 4 and 3 site Fat Caliper method for Men 12% body fat and under (Women 14% body fat and under).

Parillo Fat Caliper Method for Men & Women 15% body fat and under.

Durnin/Womersley Fat Caliper Method for Men & Women 15% body fat and under.

Tape Measure Method (the Army Method, Height, Abdomen & Neck) for everyone over the previous body fat rating. Search the Internet, plenty of on-line calculator for this.

Also they say (Body Tracker Software) that none of the previous method should be used for anyone under 18 years old.

Don't forget that you can hardly do a fat caliper measurement on yourself alone, and the person performing it, should know what to do and be constant from one test to the other (so this is why the Army method is handy, and quite accurate within few percentage value, this was compared with more accurate method, like water tank).

Personally, I will stick to the Army method for a long while (being way over the 15 % fat rating).
I use a caliper and the tape method.. as long as the results are reasonably close I'm happy.. but eve more important... what ever number I started with using this method, I use throughout the whole process... So if I've lost 5 % using this method then I've lost 5 % irregardless..

I haven't achieved single digits yet so maybe you need a more precise measuring tool for that..
gibson57guy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2007, 08:19 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PopeyeFAFL View Post
According to my Body Tracker software (basically a body fat tracker software), the body fat should be calculated using:

Jackson/Pollock 7, 4 and 3 site Fat Caliper method for Men 12% body fat and under (Women 14% body fat and under).
Does that involve drip painting?
cdkrug is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2007, 06:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 26
Default Ha ha ha, we got a "funny" member.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdkrug View Post
Does that involve drip painting?
As you figure it out, I'm sure, we are talking body building/strength training here, not artistic techniques.
PopeyeFAFL is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Features ...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger