JP Fitness Forums powered by fitness insite  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums > The New Rules of Lifting > The New Rules of Lifting - The Original
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The New Rules of Lifting - The Original Based on the original book by Lou Schuler with workout programs by Alwyn Cosgrove

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2007, 08:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
duffeymt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 406
Default DB Incline Press - Palms Facing In

What are the different target areas in the DB Incline press with plams facing in versus out?
duffeymt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 06:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
Come give daddy a hug.
 
Alan Aragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duffeymt
What are the different target areas in the DB Incline press with plams facing in versus out?
Not much... If anything it would be basic neurological variation, if that's what you're going for.

Palms facing in = more externally rotated positioning of the shoulder & wrist = slightly less crossbridging & shortening of the pec fibers at the top of the movement. While this might seem like an inherent negative, the differences are very small.

What you can do is angle the DBs where you're most comfortable, which can be either position, or anywhere in between (ie, with the dumbells at a diagonal orientation).

Last edited by Alan Aragon : 06-05-2007 at 06:54 PM.
Alan Aragon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 06:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
Seņor Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 7,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Aragon
Palms facing in = more externally rotated positioning of the shoulder & wrist = slightly less crossbridging & shortening of the pec fibers at the top of the movement. While this might seem like an inherent negative, the differences are very small. Furthermore, the increased mechanical advantage of the biceps with externally rotated wrists woul likely compensate for any differences in lifting strength anyway.
Alan, whenever I question your logic, it's always for a better understanding. However, I also know you and Alwyn have a history on bodybuilding.com.

Mechanical advantage of the bicep in a push movement? Did I read that right?

Also, I though with the palms in it would lend itself to internal rotation, not external.
Cynic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 06:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
Come give daddy a hug.
 
Alan Aragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynic
Alan, whenever I question your logic, it's always for a better understanding. However, I also know you and Alwyn have a history on bodybuilding.com.

Mechanical advantage of the bicep in a push movement? Did I read that right?

Also, I though with the palms in it would lend itself to internal rotation, not external.
I was thinking of a flye movement more than a press in the case of palms-facing, because that's typically the movement that's done in that context (picture a DB flye). Perhaps I was too assumptive here, my bad. I was actually gonna edit that for clarity after I re-read & saw "PRESS", but I got derailed by the hypnotherapist down the hall from my office referring me a client

And I interpreted "palms in" as "facing eachother" = external rotation.



In the case of a press, I still don't see much difference.
Alan Aragon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 07:38 PM   #5 (permalink)
Come give daddy a hug.
 
Alan Aragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 854
Default

Also, are we talking about achieving a palms-in position by adducting the shoulders and making the movement more of a sagital plane thing rather than a transverse? This would place more (relative) stress on the triceps & front delts than keeping the shoulders abducted from the torso.

In contrast, if we're talking strictly about varying wrist position in a DB press in a predominantly transverse plane - no real diff unless someone else wants to chime in with some insight.
Alan Aragon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 06-05-2007, 08:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 37
Default

alwyn posts on bb.com ????
richarddoughtyfitness is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 08:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
Seņor Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 7,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richarddoughtyfitness
alwyn posts on bb.com ????
He has articles on there, but I don't know if he posts in the forums.
Cynic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 08:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
Seņor Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 7,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Aragon
Also, are we talking about achieving a palms-in position by adducting the shoulders and making the movement more of a sagital plane thing rather than a transverse? This would place more (relative) stress on the triceps & front delts than keeping the shoulders abducted from the torso.
Right, neither you nor I made the clear distinction.

I assume with palms in, the elbows get brought in, as shown in the book, but one could do palm in, elbows out just as easily.

So, to make it clear, I work off the idea, palms facing in, elbows in for an internal rotation added to the press. With the palms in a pronated grip, the elbows are out for an external rotation.
Cynic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 08:15 AM   #9 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Lisa~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 5,383
Default

Cynic, you've got your internal and external rotation of the shoulder backwards. Alan's got it right.

Think about it from the anatomical position first and you'll figure it out.
__________________
Lisa Holladay, CSCS
Lisa~ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2007, 03:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
Seņor Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 7,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa~
Cynic, you've got your internal and external rotation of the shoulder backwards. Alan's got it right.

Think about it from the anatomical position first and you'll figure it out.
Damnit, I thought I had that down.
Cynic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 AM.

Features ...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger