JP Fitness Forums powered by fitness insite  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums > The New Rules of Lifting > The New Rules of Lifting - The Original
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The New Rules of Lifting - The Original Based on the original book by Lou Schuler with workout programs by Alwyn Cosgrove

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2007, 08:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Ciao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas NEVADA
Posts: 46
Default Deadlift off box concern.

For my deadlift off box, the weight plates I used were lighter, thus, smaller, so obviously they didn't allow the barbell to rest on the step as the picture in the book (pg. 109). I could barely complete all the sets this way ( I was like leaning forward more than it seems neccesary). What can I do? place my feet at the edge of the step? or lower (even more) the weight of my plates?
Thank you in advance for any input.
Olga.
Ciao is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2007, 10:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 526
Default

The object of the Box Deadlift is to maximize the range of motion. The bar should actually be high enough off the step so that you can get your fingers around it, not resting on the box.

I'm currently using dumbbells for this, which gives me roughly the same range of motion the equivalent weight on a bar would.

Mind you, this is MUCH more difficult than conventional Deads. You won't be able to pull nearly as much weight atop the box.
cdkrug is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 11:36 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Ciao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas NEVADA
Posts: 46
Default

Tell me about it!
Thanks for the information.
Olga.
Ciao is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 01:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
nobody's ass-kisser
 
Espi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NLs
Posts: 5,818
Default

If you're using a step bench there's a discovery that made my life easier. Don't have the bar along with the step bench/box but across it.

So that you're kinda making a T with the bar slightly below the top.

I've been using this method for Romanian DLs since my arms are relatively longer than my legs and I couldn't get a ham stretch when lifting off the floor.
__________________
Ergo-log: news & KB on legal & illegal ergogenic aids
Poliquin: "There's no overtraining, only undereating" --> to undereat, don't overtrain!"
Burgener: "There's no overtraining, only underrecovery" --> sleep, rest & recover
journal: Go with the flow
Espi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 09:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Ciao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas NEVADA
Posts: 46
Default

A pleasure to meet again in this forum too Espi! Your advise sounds interesting; I did my second workout (FLIII A) and it was totally better than the first one.
Thanks,
Olga.
Ciao is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-01-2007, 09:16 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 812
Default

If you use smaller plates, you are already increasing the range of motion. I use "standard" bb and have only 25s, not 50s, so I figure everytime I deadlift I am doing a little extra motion. If you use a bunch of 10 pound plates you may not need to stand on anything.

Anybody know what the height is, bar off the ground, on an oly bar with 45s? My standard bar with the 25s is about 5.5" off the ground, and about 3.5" if I pile on a bunch of 10s.

Obviously, you can only add so many 10s. But for higher rep ranges, and given the extra range of motion, I am betting this would work for a lot of people.
rwmct is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 03:20 AM   #7 (permalink)
nobody's ass-kisser
 
Espi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NLs
Posts: 5,818
Default

This discussion on putting smaller disks on the bb reminds me of when I started deadlifting again. At first I used fixed weight barbells that were easier for me because of smaller diameter and shorter length. But with the narrow sleeves/cuffs (whatever) there were only that many 2.5 kg disks you can keep adding without having them fall off.

Using a longer and thicker barbell was a shock, because gripping strength diminished by so much, and balancing became harder too.
But then came another shock. Going from 10kg disks to 15kg to 20kg disks all required adaptations. And to my amazement, it was easier to lift multiple smaller disks off the floor than less larger disks. Unless I'd put a few plates under my feet and turning it into a kinda 'off the box' DL.

It all comes down to "not being able to use legs for powering up the bb' when the bb is too high off the floor. Apparently, a DL is a back exercise in the end, not so much a leg exercise, unless you really squat down.
Considering the pics in NROL, you wonder what Alwyn & Lou want us to do.
__________________
Ergo-log: news & KB on legal & illegal ergogenic aids
Poliquin: "There's no overtraining, only undereating" --> to undereat, don't overtrain!"
Burgener: "There's no overtraining, only underrecovery" --> sleep, rest & recover
journal: Go with the flow
Espi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 12:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Lisa~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 5,383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Espi
Apparently, a DL is a back exercise in the end, not so much a leg exercise, unless you really squat down.
A deadlift and any of the deadlift variations is an exercise for the whole posterior chain, glutes and hamstrings most specifically. If you cannot feel your legs working, then the load is too light or your form is incorrect. The height of the bar does not diminish the contribution from the hips. Consider a rack pull. The bar is set on pins in the power rack just below knee height (higher than when a bar loaded with 45's is on the floor). The purpose of the exercise is to target the glutes, to push the glutes through. This is still a posterior chain movement. There's a video of rack pulls in this article: (De)-Constructing Computer Guy.
__________________
Lisa Holladay, CSCS
Lisa~ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 04:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Ciao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas NEVADA
Posts: 46
Default

You've all got great points about the deadlifs. I do feel my legs working when I perform them and I can definitely notice the increased range of motion with the smaller plates.
All these LB exercises have really changed my butt (as stated in my other post), so everytime I feel like throwing away the bb, I just remember that and keep going.
Thanks again for your input.
Olga.
Ciao is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Features ...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger