Quote:
|
The 8% is for aesthetics. What you are saying is that it's impossible to make strength gains while on a 2000 calorie diet? I'm guessing you are right because its very difficult to fit in 180 grams of protein on what I'm eating.
|
I'm not saying it's impossible. I'm saying it's not optimal. And that you'll probably end up disappointed in your performance gains compared to what you could achieve if you were consuming more calories.
Quote:
|
'm mainly having to cut the majority of my carbs from my diet.
|
I'm probably more of a proponent of low-carb diets than anyone on this board (well, me and Bond!). But for optimal athletic performance, you'll still want carbs. I would recommend reading "Nutrient Timing". (You can find it on Amazon.) I think the guidelines in there are excellent for your goals. You won't achieve fat loss at the rate you want (in my opinion) but you will give you the nutrients you need when you need them to add muscle size and strength. A nice side effect is that you'll most likely improve body composition, so you will be losing fat.
Quote:
If its possible to eat a diet that was around 2000 with at least 200 grams of protein what would stop me from making strength gains? Just wondering if it is possible.
But I hear what you are saying, I need to decide whats more important. As far as what I need for rugby- its mainly speed, strength and endurance, probably in that order. The 8% is entirely aesthetic.
|
The protein increased protein most likely won't have any effect on your rate of strength gain. Sure, you're giving your body the raw materials to make muscle, but it's going to use the raw materials for energy first, since you're low on total energy. Your body increases its rate of gluconeogenesis--converting protein to carbohydrate (glucose)--when protein consumption is increases and carbohydrate consumption is decreased. There is a nice fatloss side effect in that this is a calorically expensive process, but it won't help you to gain strength.
Again, I'm not saying that you can't gain strength on a 2000 calorie diet, only that you probably won't see large gains in strength.
If you decide that fat loss is your main goal, I do like a low-carb diet that's actually higher in calories, using the "Nutrient Timing" workout methods around your workout. You don't achieve ketosis, but you keep insulin levels low (high insulin level inhibit fat loss) all day with the exception of around your workout where you use it to reduce protein breakdown. I have found this method to be highly effective. However, I'd ditch the bread and increase your vegetable and fiber intake (a fiber supplement like Benefiber is a great addition to meals).
Lots of people on the board will disagree with these recommendations or at least offer that with a high activity level you can get just as good of results with a moderate carb intake (30-40 percent). I would say they are right for the most part and that you won't go wrong with that method. However, if you avoid breads, pasta, and rice all day (but eat plenty of vegetables--as many servings as you can) along with meat (fish, chicken, beef, turkey), then have a carb/protein shake before, during, and after your workout, you will see great results. (I would recommend NOT restricting your calorie intake.)
Like I said, though, you will receive other types of advice which will work really well. I think this is a method that makes sense to me physiologically.