JP Fitness Forums powered by fitness insite  
Google
 
Web forums.jpfitness.com

Go Back   JP Fitness Forums > Nutrition > Diet, Nutrition and Supplementation
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Diet, Nutrition and Supplementation Post here for supplement reviews or nutritional advice. If you're trying to get "ripped abz" THIS is where you should be.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-18-2009, 04:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Katydid77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 922
Default Basic advice on figuring my calories .. I am starting today

Okay, I have read the book New Lifting for Women (just finished last night) and I am very excited to get started!

I have been cruising the forums and trying to glean information. What I SILL am at a loss for, is how to figure out what my calorie counts should be per day?!

I know it is silly, and the info is probably staring me right in the face, but I just can't seem to get a firm number.

My stats: I am 32 y/o female, 160 lbs, size 12/14 dress right now, and five feet tall (no inches lol)

I am fairly active in normal life (work in a restaurant) but have no real background with lifting (where I knew what I was doing).

Tonight when I get home, I am going to start the log, and try to get everything situated, including organizing my workout journal to take to the gym and watch the videos of exercises to make sure i understand how to do them.

SOOO can someone please be kind and point me in the direction of how many calories to take in per day????

Thank you so much, and HI to everyone, as I plan on being an active member!
Katydid77 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 04:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Scale Watch: 130.2
 
missjane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,012
Default

For the nutrition guidelines in NROL4W, the formulas are in the book on pages 63-67.
__________________
Jane
My Training Log
My eBay Store

~This is an lolcat-free zone~
~This is a no "bro" zone -- sooooo sick of that word!~

"If someone says I can't, then it makes me all the more determined to prove that I can."
-- Michael Phelps
missjane is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 09:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 180
Default

I don't have NROL4W, but you can get try the harris-benedict forumals here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris-Benedict_equation
EasyRhino is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 10:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
You mean three DOG moon!
 
Lost Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The South Bay!
Posts: 19,244
Default

Are you just confused about the formula in the book? Where's the issue and maybe we can help.
__________________
-
-
Lost Dog's Blog

workout log
& fitday

"The wolves spoke to me in a language all their own; it was like German, Mongol, and Bitchin' all mixed together."
Lost Dog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 11:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Katydid77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 922
Default

alright according to what I THINK I have understood in the book . . .

160lbs divided by 2.2 =72.72 kg

795+(7.18 x 73) = 1319 calorie resting metabolic rate

my BMI is 31 (yikes) and so that means

non-active expected calorie expenditure of 1979
active workout day expenditure of 2242

soooo . . with deducting the 300 calories for losing weight (rounded up)

non-active days 1700 calories
active days 1950 calories


Am I correct?

If there is some key I am missing, please let me know
Katydid77 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-19-2009, 02:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katydid77 View Post
alright according to what I THINK I have understood in the book . . .

160lbs divided by 2.2 =72.72 kg

795+(7.18 x 73) = 1319 calorie resting metabolic rate

my BMI is 31 (yikes) and so that means

non-active expected calorie expenditure of 1979
active workout day expenditure of 2242

soooo . . with deducting the 300 calories for losing weight (rounded up)

non-active days 1700 calories
active days 1950 calories


Am I correct?

If there is some key I am missing, please let me know
Sounds low enough for a decent deficit and high enough to risk over-dieting (given the demands of NROL4W).
PlankIt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 04:18 PM   #7 (permalink)
eastern european chick
 
galya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 3,743
Default

You cannot know that until you have actually tried it.
galya is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 04:20 PM   #8 (permalink)
eastern european chick
 
galya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 3,743
Default

Katydid, whatever number you start from do not forget that this is a test number for how your body responds. It could be low or high, but measure at the start of your project, eat the assigned calories for 2 weeks, assess and then decide how to move on. Nothing is an exact science here even though numbers may help figure things out.
galya is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 08:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
also known as patty
 
TheWookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: the NY part of CT
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlankIt View Post
Sounds low enough for a decent deficit and high enough to risk over-dieting (given the demands of NROL4W).
High enough to risk... or high enough to not risk?

I suspect you meant the latter.
__________________
training log
blog thang
TheWookie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 09:02 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWookie View Post
High enough to risk... or high enough to not risk?

I suspect you meant the latter.
Latter. For a starting point. If she needs more, she can always adjust, but it isn't so low that I'd worry about not being able to accomplish the workouts. I also personally prefer to see results immediately after starting a diet. Instant feedback tends to remind me that weightloss is doable and that my body isn't crazy... but then again, that is me
PlankIt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 09:13 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Katydid77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 922
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by galya View Post
Katydid, whatever number you start from do not forget that this is a test number for how your body responds. It could be low or high, but measure at the start of your project, eat the assigned calories for 2 weeks, assess and then decide how to move on. Nothing is an exact science here even though numbers may help figure things out.

Thanks. Okay, that is the basis I am going to work from for a starting point. I just did my first day with calorie deficit today (logged in onto my training journal)

I do well with structure and I'm really excited about all this!
Katydid77 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 07:32 AM   #12 (permalink)
eastern european chick
 
galya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 3,743
Default

Good luck and keep us posted
galya is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 07:23 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Default

So in NROL4W you do not eat back the calories you burn in exercise, correct? Some sites i use will tell you if you set your calories at light activity then you track your exercise and eat back wht you burned.
If you have your calories set to active or very active you don't eat back calories because they are figured into the total.
On here my nonworkout days says to eat 1664 and workout days 1847 or something lke that. It seems high to me. I think i will just stick to the 1664 and unless i burn an excess amount of calories just let it be. Anyone follow me here? thanks
suz2345 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 09:00 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 180
Default

Do whatever works for you.

Some days I'm at a deficit from eating lesss. Those work. Other days I'm at a deficit solely through exercise. Those work too. Other days I'm at a caloric surplus. Those aren't really on-target, but as long as I have bigger deficits, I can get away with it.

For fat loss I treat most of the work as the diet, and the exercise is just gravy. fat loss gravy.
EasyRhino is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 12:35 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,092
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suz2345 View Post
So in NROL4W you do not eat back the calories you burn in exercise, correct? Some sites i use will tell you if you set your calories at light activity then you track your exercise and eat back wht you burned.
If you have your calories set to active or very active you don't eat back calories because they are figured into the total.
On here my nonworkout days says to eat 1664 and workout days 1847 or something lke that. It seems high to me. I think i will just stick to the 1664 and unless i burn an excess amount of calories just let it be. Anyone follow me here? thanks
No you do not eat your calories "back". The calorie allotment takes your exercise/activity level into account.
LaraT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 03:40 PM   #16 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaraT View Post
No you do not eat your calories "back". The calorie allotment takes your exercise/activity level into account.

Ok thanks for clearing that up for me. The bad thing is on days i ride my bike or run I'm going to have a huge deficit but i guess i can just make sure I eat at least enough back to have 1200 calories.
suz2345 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 03:44 PM   #17 (permalink)
dividing by zero
 
LisaS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange Cty, CA
Posts: 6,485
Default

In practice you do "eat back" your weight training calories - that's the basis of the higher intake level on training days. However, you don't count days with cardio as training days so on those days, yes, you will have a bigger deficit. But then if you are intent on following the plan as outlined in the book you won't be having many hard cardio sessions.

On the other hand, if you are only following the workout plan and doing what you want for cardio (as hard or often as you want), then eat more if you don't want a big deficit.
__________________
Training Log


Quote:
Water babies singing in a lily-pool delight
Blue powder monkeys praying in the dead of night
LisaS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 PM.

Features ...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger