I posted this in the
Training forum, but thought it'd work here too:
Check out
this article adapted from a new book by Gary Taubes called "Good Calories, Bad Calories" He basically says theres no scientific evidence linking exercise with fat loss, and in fact, there is evidence to the contrary. Exercising leads to increased hunger, and therefore increased consumption of food, often of starchy carbs, which leads to an increase in insulin, which makes us fat regardless of our caloric output.
What's most disturbing to me is he says that no matter how hard we exercise, an enzyme called lipoprotein lipase (LPL) works to restore as much fat as we used in exercise. Here's the passage:
"In the eighties, biochemists and physiologists worked out how LPL responds to exercise. They found that during a workout, LPL activity increases in muscle tissue, and so our muscle cells suck up fatty acids to use for fuel. Then, when we’re done exercising, LPL activity in the muscle tissue tapers off and LPL activity in our fat tissue spikes, pulling calories into fat cells. This works to return to the fat cells any fat they might have had to surrender—homeostasis, in other words. The more rigorous the exercise, and the more fat lost from our fat tissue, the greater the subsequent increase in LPL activity in the fat cells. Thus, post-workout, we get hungry: Our fat tissue is devoting itself to restoring calories as fat, depriving other tissues and organs of the fuel they need and triggering a compensatory impulse to eat. The feeling of hunger is the brain’s way of trying to satisfy the demands of the body. Just as sweating makes us thirsty, burning off calories makes us hungry."
What does everyone think?