I donno. it'd prolly be in the general vicinity of that, but remember that even with the GWF, your "burn" may not be super accurate, and moreover, the cals you're consuming are still estimates/averages and are subject to a margin of error. So, you only can get so accurate, and when you add one set of margins of error (expenditure), another set of margins of error (consumption), and the weird workings of the body when it comes to water, electrolytes, hormones, etc…, AND you add in that you can't really know bf without ANOTHER margin of error… Darlin, it's a royal pain in the ass. It does seem to work out great for some people, and the math is spot the fuck on. Then there's the rest of us…
But taking into account all the error-prone bits, yeah, you'd prolly see some kind of trend average over a longish time period. I don't know that it'd be, but it'd prolly end up as something you could use as a guide for yourself, i spoze.
|