"Science is how you back up your marketing claims."
Sorry, but I have to take with a grain of salt a post entered twice in these forums on the same day that the poster has just signed up.
And I'm not about to e-mail the person who posted, thus spreading my e-mail address further into unknown territory and probably increasing the flood of spam.
Besides, the statement quoted is indicative of a certain mind set. Marketing a product comes first, that's the motive. "Science" is the means of backing up the desire to sell something.
And to sell what, in this context? Probably a supplement of some ilk, that we're supposed to believe will turn us into centaurs.
But as far as recent material on anti=doping goes, here are a couple of very recent links that won't last long.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../26/CATLIN.TMP
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/sp...partner=GOOGLE