Quote:
Originally Posted by justagurll
what i meant, in the context of this thread, was that male trainers should not react to gender, so yes - i my statement was not correct. I still stand by part of my statement that muscles react the same to being taxed, regardless of gender - other factors excluded. results wont be the same and that includes gender, same-gender/ethnicity, gender aside/genetics, and of course people who boost. yet it's silly to get in to those specifics...
|
I can demonstrate quite clearly that male and female muscles don't adapt identically.
The general process is similar, but there are very real differences in how the muscle responds to any given stimulus, and you can't just ignore them.
I don't think these differences call for any end-user changes, such as offering different training programs, which is what I think (hope) you're getting at, though.
Quote:
|
what i find funny is men who say isolation does not produce results when i see almost all men isolating much moreso than women.
|
Debatable at best.
Also: I find it funny that white people say smoking is bad when many white people smoke.
Quote:
|
now maybe its symantecs but there is a clear discrimination toward women from men in the gym. this idea that training should differ, is chauvinistic...
|
I think the differences in perceptions towards male and female training has more to do with ignorance of physiology than it does of anything else.
Quote:
|
some men here dont wanna listen. you all should continue training men as i'm sure you do well. from what ive read, its mostly these men that refuse to have an intelligent give and take. why bother posting?
|
You enjoy your generalizations, don't you? I find that deliciously ironic from someone complaining about male chauvinism.