Look guys if Julie had a legitamate call-out about something that I said in this thread then it would all be different and fair and even fun. (in fact I really was just having fun with it when I thought it was a legitmate call out) But then Roland jumps in so I see that there is perhaps something deeper going on. It turns out by her own admission that her agenda was very different then to come in and take part in the conversation. In fact it the agenda is about some talking that is going on behind my back which she felt just to put out in the open for some reason.
That is what I am calling out here. Not the fact that she had something to say but that she had an agenda behind what she said. An agenda that I did not know about. I both take and dish and even admit that I am wrong and try to always end it with respect (see that "why" thread again) If however, there is a problem with the way I am communicating and people are PMing her privately about it, then the way to handle it should probably also be done in private. If people talk about me instead of to me then how do I know what is going on?
|