Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulmen
The reason I think that study is shit is because 1) The sample is too small. 177 people is not enough.
2)I can never know if they accurately used height, weight, and BF percentages.
It just sounds like a weak inductive argument to say the average FFMI of 177 people is 25 thus no one can go over 25 FFMI.
|
The reason anecdotes are shit[er] is because 1) The sample size is too small. 1 people is not enough.
1.1) The sample is chosen to demonstrate the chooser's bias.
2) I can never know if they accurately used heigher, weight, and BF percentages.
2.1) I can never know if they are natural or "natural".
I still like the science sport.