Thread: The 90% Rule
View Single Post
Old 04-16-2008, 01:46 PM   #4 (permalink)
PowerManDL
God of Mischief
 
PowerManDL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bizarro World, down near Rand McNally
Posts: 1,905
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dillytl View Post
That equates to only 76.8% adherence and that is unfortunately much too low.
Why is that much too low?

If I'm eating 1600 kcals/day as a 200+ lb guy, which can happen, then that same 11200 calories yields a 9800 kcal deficit for the week. A pound of fat is ~3500 kcal.

If I veer off that as in the example, and eat 2600 calories extra, well damn....I might only drop 2 lbs this week instead of three.

In other words, this takes no account for the person's size or needs. Whoever wrote this seems to be confusing "adherence" with "calorie intake". I'd consider the calorie total to be more important than some arbitrary percentage of "adherence".
__________________

Latest offering: Review: The Reactive Training Manual

I am thought of highly by those without jobs.

"Yeah, but you did your post grad thesis on trolling, so you don't count."
-JP, endorsing how awesome I am
PowerManDL is offline   Reply With Quote