View Single Post
Old 10-19-2007, 11:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
I. Kay
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 6,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Aragon View Post
It's a case study, take it for what you will, completely dismiss it if you want to. I personally think it raises a provocative point.
It is provocative. But I believe OG and I aren't satisfied with something simply because it was done "officially" or "scientifically". That's not a knock on you, Alan, just a suggestion of where we might be coming from in response to that study.

And I certainly don't know Coach Hale very well, but his response to mine is a little awkward. I know where he is coming from : "Don't knock my numbers without your own". I get it. But I'm not trying to knock his facts. I'm just explaining what I've seen/heard/experienced. I'm not going to dismiss the "real life" (sorry, terrible term, but you know what I mean) experiences of myself and 12 other people simply because I can't report any "Primary Research Data" (capitalized :p). I'm also not going to come to any definite conclusions about it either. That's why I brought it up in here, to see if there is any evidence of the importance of allergies.
I. Kay is offline   Reply With Quote