View Single Post
Old 09-26-2005, 02:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
wingsfan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 959
Post

don't ask me why i started thinking of this the other day as i was driving home from work...

one thing that i think is a missing link on this is that you don't know if you are doing something correctly until after you have done it.

for example. let's say you are playing tennis and you learn what the correct sound should be when the ball hits the racket. if you hear the sound, then you know your form/technique was good. if you don't hear the sound, then your form/technique was not good.

but, the problem is that you don't know how you're doing until it's over. transferring that into competition, if you hear the sound and it's the "not good" sound, then there's nothing you can do because you may have already lost the point.

am i making sense on what i see as a problem with this or am i missing the overall goal of using this technique to obtain better technique?
__________________
"Don't ever think you have got it figured out!"
-Lee Taft
wingsfan is offline   Reply With Quote